Until recently, no major US study had estimated the association between long-term exposure to noise and cardiovascular outcomes while accounting for the potential confounding from air pollution and socioeconomic determinants of health. This project linked national data on Medicare enrollees and noise contours surrounding each of 89 airports to eval
...
Correia, A. W., Peters, J. L., Levy, J., Melly, S., & Dominici, F. (2013). Residential Exposure to Aircraft Noise and Hospital Admissions for Cardiovascular Diseases: Multi-Airport Retrospective Study. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Center of Excellence for Alternative Jet Fuels and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5561
Correia, Andrew W, Junenette L Peters, Jonathan Levy, Steven Melly, and Francesca Dominici. Residential Exposure to Aircraft Noise and Hospital Admissions for Cardiovascular Diseases: Multi-Airport Retrospective Study. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Center of Excellence for Alternative Jet Fuels and Environment, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5561.
Correia, Andrew W, et al. Residential Exposure to Aircraft Noise and Hospital Admissions for Cardiovascular Diseases: Multi-Airport Retrospective Study. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Center of Excellence for Alternative Jet Fuels and Environment, 2013, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5561.
This study investigated the strengths and weaknesses of manual entry as compared to loadable entry of uplinked clearances into the B-777 FMS. The Honeywell team hypothesized that each method would yield unique advantages and disadvantages. To investigate the limitations and capabilities of loadable versus manual entry of uplink clearances, we inves
...
Lozito, S., Martin, L., Dulchinos, V., Kaneshige, J., & Sharma, S. (2013). An Investigation of Flight Deck Data Link in the Terminal Area (Report No. FAA project 06-05 Attachment G). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64696
Lozito, Sandy, Lynne Martin, Vicki Dulchinos, John Kaneshige, and Shivanjli Sharma. An Investigation of Flight Deck Data Link in the Terminal Area. Report no. FAA project 06-05 Attachment G. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64696.
Lozito, Sandy, et al. An Investigation of Flight Deck Data Link in the Terminal Area. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013, Report no. FAA project 06-05 Attachment G, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64696.
The Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) consists of a series of transformations designed to increase the capacity, safety, and security of air traffic operations. A key element of NextGen is trajectory operations. This research addresses minimum human factors requirements for flight deck interface design and operating procedures to
...
Baker, K. M., Chang, C. H., DiMare, S. K., Nelson, E., Thornton, M. R., Benson, W., Kelley, D., Olmstead, R., Erchov, S., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2013). Trajectory Operations Human Factors Study: Disseminating and Entering Trajectory Clearances (Report No. GMU-TR-2012-04, Revision 2). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62282
Baker, Kelley M, Chia-Hsuan Chang, Sara K DiMare, Erik Nelson, M Ross Thornton, William Benson, Devon Kelley, Ryan Olmstead, Simone Erchov, and Deborah A Boehm-Davis. Trajectory Operations Human Factors Study: Disseminating and Entering Trajectory Clearances. Report no. GMU-TR-2012-04, Revision 2. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62282.
Baker, Kelley M, et al. Trajectory Operations Human Factors Study: Disseminating and Entering Trajectory Clearances. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013, Report no. GMU-TR-2012-04, Revision 2, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62282.
This report summarizes two part‐task studies addressing flight deck data communication procedures. The purpose of the studies was to evaluate procedures for receiving and reading data comm messages. There is a risk of misunderstanding complex clearances, so the study results could help to reduce this risk. After analyzing three alternatives, our re
...
Baker, K. M., DiMare, S. K., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2013). Data Communications Human Factors: Task 2: Flight Deck Procedures (Report No. GMU-TR-2012-06, Revision 2). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62280
Baker, Kelley M, Sara K DiMare, and Deborah A Boehm-Davis. Data Communications Human Factors: Task 2: Flight Deck Procedures. Report no. GMU-TR-2012-06, Revision 2. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62280.
Baker, Kelley M, et al. Data Communications Human Factors: Task 2: Flight Deck Procedures. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013, Report no. GMU-TR-2012-06, Revision 2, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62280.
As DataComm is a key enabling technology that significantly affects human performance, human factors experts have anticipated potential implementation challenges (Cardosi, Lennertz and Donahoe (2010). One significant issue is that DataComm equipment may not be integrated with flight management systems (FMS). The crew will be required to read the Da
...
Gallimore, J., Shingledecker, C., & Tsang, P. (2013). DataComm – Display Alternatives for the Flight Deck: Overview and Human Factors Recommendations Volume 1. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62287
Gallimore, JJ, C Shingledecker, and PS Tsang. DataComm – Display Alternatives for the Flight Deck: Overview and Human Factors Recommendations Volume 1. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62287.
Gallimore, JJ, et al. DataComm – Display Alternatives for the Flight Deck: Overview and Human Factors Recommendations Volume 1. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62287.
As DataComm is a key enabling technology that significantly affects human performance, human factors experts have anticipated potential implementation challenges (Cardosi, Lennertz and Donahoe (2010). One significant issue is that DataComm equipment may not be integrated with flight management systems (FMS). The crew will be required to read the Da
...
Gallimore, J., Shingledecker, C., & Tsang, P. (2013). DataComm – Display Alternatives for the Flight Deck: Overview and Human Factors Recommendations Volume 2: Experiment Details. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62288
Gallimore, JJ, C Shingledecker, and PS Tsang. DataComm – Display Alternatives for the Flight Deck: Overview and Human Factors Recommendations Volume 2: Experiment Details. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62288.
Gallimore, JJ, et al. DataComm – Display Alternatives for the Flight Deck: Overview and Human Factors Recommendations Volume 2: Experiment Details. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62288.
As new flight deck automation is introduced, there is interest in considering whether unintended uses of such new flight deck automation could affect the safety of operations in the NextGen NAS. The study team collected 24 examples of present day unintended uses from 22 current and retired commercial airline pilots, and identified the systems assoc
...
Lakinsmith, P. A., Loomis, L. L., Sanford, B. D., & Sharkey, T. J. (2013). Unintended Uses of Automation Human Factors Study. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62929
Lakinsmith, Patricia A, Leslie L Loomis, Beverly D. Sanford, and Thomas J Sharkey. Unintended Uses of Automation Human Factors Study. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62929.
Lakinsmith, Patricia A, et al. Unintended Uses of Automation Human Factors Study. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62929.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration
...
2013-01-01
|
PDF
The FAA Aerospace Forecasts are developed to support budget and planning needs of the FAA. The forecasts are developed using statistical models to explain and incorporate emerging trends of the different segments of the aviation industry.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, & United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans (2013). FAA Aerospace Forecast: Fiscal Years 2013-2033. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59850
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration and United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans. FAA Aerospace Forecast: Fiscal Years 2013-2033. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59850.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, et al. FAA Aerospace Forecast: Fiscal Years 2013-2033. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2013, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59850.
With the most recent US field study dating back to 1996 and compared to the efforts of other, especially European, countries, US research on the effects of aircraft noise on sleep has lagged over the past 15 years, while aircraft noise has continued to evolve. Within this period, air traffic has changed significantly, with substantial increases in
...
Basner, M. (2012). Design for a U.S. Field Study on the Effects of Aircraft Noise on Sleep: PARTNER Project 25B Year One Report (Report No. PARTNER-COE-2012-003). Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/66450
Basner, Mathias. Design for a U.S. Field Study on the Effects of Aircraft Noise on Sleep: PARTNER Project 25B Year One Report. Report no. PARTNER-COE-2012-003. Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/66450.
Basner, Mathias Design for a U.S. Field Study on the Effects of Aircraft Noise on Sleep: PARTNER Project 25B Year One Report. Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction, 2012, Report no. PARTNER-COE-2012-003, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/66450.
This paper examines the chemical composition and energy content of several fuel options that could hypothetically be used with the existing fleet of aircraft.
Hileman, J., Stratton, J., & Donohoo, P. E. (2012). Energy Content and Alternative Jet Fuel Viability. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46232
Hileman, James, Jim Stratton, and Pearl E Donohoo. Energy Content and Alternative Jet Fuel Viability. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46232.
Hileman, James, et al. Energy Content and Alternative Jet Fuel Viability. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46232.
NASA provided a broad overview of flight crew decision making and training challenges expected to result from the implementation of NextGen automation, including decision support automation. Recommendations included the following human factors recommendations and caveats for the design of future flight deck systems: - Pilots Need Accurate Mental Mo
...
Mosier, K., Fischer, U., & Orasanu, J. (2012). Addressing the Challenges in NextGen Decision Making. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Human Factors Division. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64856
Mosier, Kathleen, Ute Fischer, and Judith Orasanu. Addressing the Challenges in NextGen Decision Making. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Human Factors Division, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64856.
Mosier, Kathleen, et al. Addressing the Challenges in NextGen Decision Making. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Human Factors Division, 2012, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64856.
This report investigated the implications of two possible response scenarios resulting from a CO2 certification standard for future aircraft. This research expanded upon previous, related work in this area by examining potential responses and additional environmental impacts. The analyses described in this report detail the systematic analyses unde
...
Bernardo, J., Boling, B., Bonnefoy, P. A., Burdette, G. A., Hansman, R. J., Kirby, M., Lim, D., Mavris, D., Mozdzanowska, A., Nam, T., & Pfaender, H. (2012). CO2 Emission Metrics for Commercial Aircraft Certification: A National Airspace System Perspective (Report No. PARTNER-COE-2012-002). Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/66505
Bernardo, Jose, Bryan Boling, Philippe A. Bonnefoy, Graham A. Burdette, R John Hansman, Michelle Kirby, and Dongwook Lim, et al.. CO2 Emission Metrics for Commercial Aircraft Certification: A National Airspace System Perspective. Report no. PARTNER-COE-2012-002. Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/66505.
Bernardo, Jose, et al. CO2 Emission Metrics for Commercial Aircraft Certification: A National Airspace System Perspective. Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction, 2012, Report no. PARTNER-COE-2012-002, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/66505.
Birds and other wildlife strikes cost the U.S. civil aviation industry over $620 million per year (Dolbeer & Wright 2008). Airfield wildlife place human life in jeopardy during take-offs and landings. Wildlife hazards may be especially problematic for General Aviation airports in farm friendly regions. Habitat Management for an integrated approach.
...
Vogler, D., & Baricuska, K. D. (2012). Non-Wildlife-Attracting Native and Naturalized Turf Species Suitable for Use on Airfields Managed for Wildlife Hazards in the Northeast. State University of New York. College at Oneonta. Biology Department. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36489
Vogler, Donna and Kristin Dorsch Baricuska. Non-Wildlife-Attracting Native and Naturalized Turf Species Suitable for Use on Airfields Managed for Wildlife Hazards in the Northeast. State University of New York. College at Oneonta. Biology Department, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36489.
Vogler, Donna, and Kristin Dorsch Baricuska Non-Wildlife-Attracting Native and Naturalized Turf Species Suitable for Use on Airfields Managed for Wildlife Hazards in the Northeast. State University of New York. College at Oneonta. Biology Department, 2012, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36489.
This study addresses the gap in scientific information at the intersection of Trajectory-Based Operations (TBO), realistic flight deck – pilot tasking environments, and human performance assessment. The study explored pilot performance, pain points, and system improvements in a human-in-the-loop heuristic evaluation of prototype displays for select
...
Lancaster, J., Riddle, K., Feyereisen, T., Olofinboba, O., Rogers, B., Wyatt, S., He, G., Suddreth, J., & Gannon, A. (2012). Trajectory Based Operations and the Legacy Flight Deck: Envisioning Design Enhancements for the Flight Crew. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Human Factors Division. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64855
Lancaster, Jeff, Kenyon Riddle, Thea Feyereisen, Olu Olofinboba, Bill Rogers, Sandy Wyatt, Gang He, John Suddreth, and Aaron Gannon. Trajectory Based Operations and the Legacy Flight Deck: Envisioning Design Enhancements for the Flight Crew. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Human Factors Division, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64855.
Lancaster, Jeff, et al. Trajectory Based Operations and the Legacy Flight Deck: Envisioning Design Enhancements for the Flight Crew. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Human Factors Division, 2012, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64855.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute
2012-01-01
|
Aeromedical Safety Brochures
|
PDF
Aeromedical Safety Brochures are prepared for general aviation pilots, commercial pilots and physicians. The brochures acquaint the aviation community with the physiological challenges of the aviation environment and relevant safety concerns.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (2012). FAA MedXPress Program for Pilots: Your Express Lane to Medical Certification (Report No. OK-12-1676-JAH). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1403425
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. FAA MedXPress Program for Pilots: Your Express Lane to Medical Certification. Report no. OK-12-1676-JAH. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1403425.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute FAA MedXPress Program for Pilots: Your Express Lane to Medical Certification. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2012, Report no. OK-12-1676-JAH, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1403425.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration
...
2012-01-01
|
PDF
The FAA Aerospace Forecasts are developed to support budget and planning needs of the FAA. The forecasts are developed using statistical models to explain and incorporate emerging trends of the different segments of the aviation industry.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, & United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans (2012). FAA Aerospace Forecast: Fiscal Years 2012-2032. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59849
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration and United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans. FAA Aerospace Forecast: Fiscal Years 2012-2032. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59849.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, et al. FAA Aerospace Forecast: Fiscal Years 2012-2032. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2012, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59849.
Alternative fuels represent a potential option for reducing the climate impacts of the aviation sector.
Stratton, R., Wolfe, P. J., & Hileman, J. (2011). Impact of Aviation Non-CO2 Combustion Effects on the Environmental Feasibility of Alternative Jet Fuels. ACS Publications. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2017522
Stratton, Russell, Philip J Wolfe, and James Hileman. Impact of Aviation Non-CO2 Combustion Effects on the Environmental Feasibility of Alternative Jet Fuels. ACS Publications, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2017522.
Stratton, Russell, et al. Impact of Aviation Non-CO2 Combustion Effects on the Environmental Feasibility of Alternative Jet Fuels. ACS Publications, 2011, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2017522.
Research Integrations as subcontractor to National Institute of Aerospace completed a series of reviews and analyses to provide the FAA with guidelines and recommendations for flight crew training in the future NextGen environment. This future environment is expected to require increased flight deck automation to enable National Airspace System (NA
...
Lyall, B., England, R., Harron, G., Hoffa, B., Jones, E., Lyall, M., Taylor, S., & Wilson, J. (2011). Flight Crew Training for NextGen Automation. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64450
Lyall, Beth, Robert England, Greg Harron, Bob Hoffa, Emily Jones, Michele Lyall, Stephanie Taylor, and Jennifer Wilson. Flight Crew Training for NextGen Automation. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2011. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64450.
Lyall, Beth, et al. Flight Crew Training for NextGen Automation. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2011, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64450.
Implementation of NextGen improvements will require shifts in the roles and responsibilities of flightdeck, ATC and FOC personnel and that these changes will require the development of new flightdeck-ATC-FOC collaborative systems within the context of advanced automation and new procedures. In order to design and implement systems that will realize
...
Seamster, T. L., Chevalley, E., & Kanki, B. G. (2011). Collaborative Systems Assessment: Flightdeck, Air Traffic Control, Flight Operations Center and Automation. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64441
Seamster, Thomas L, Eric Chevalley, and Barbara G. Kanki. Collaborative Systems Assessment: Flightdeck, Air Traffic Control, Flight Operations Center and Automation. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2011. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64441.
Seamster, Thomas L, et al. Collaborative Systems Assessment: Flightdeck, Air Traffic Control, Flight Operations Center and Automation. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2011, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64441.
Honeywell explored the limitations and capabilities of the Controller/Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC) interface with aircraft navigation and guidance systems. This report contains sections describing a literature review, an engineering analysis methods and results, and recommendations. The literature review covers an overview of differences
...
Pepitone, D., Fugedy, J., & Letsu-Dake, E. (2011). CPDLC Procedures: Recommendations for General System Performance Requirements, Design of Standard Operating Procedures and Operating Limitations for CPDLC (Report No. DTFAWA-10-A-80031-MYY-01-ZZ). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62279
Pepitone, D, J Fugedy, and E Letsu-Dake. CPDLC Procedures: Recommendations for General System Performance Requirements, Design of Standard Operating Procedures and Operating Limitations for CPDLC. Report no. DTFAWA-10-A-80031-MYY-01-ZZ. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2011. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62279.
Pepitone, D, et al. CPDLC Procedures: Recommendations for General System Performance Requirements, Design of Standard Operating Procedures and Operating Limitations for CPDLC. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2011, Report no. DTFAWA-10-A-80031-MYY-01-ZZ, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/62279.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.