Al-Nazer, L., Raslear, T., Wilson, R., & Kidd, J. (2017). Quantification of the Sensitivity of Two Prevalent Track Inspection Systems (Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-17/03). United States. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37340
Al-Nazer, Leith, Thomas Raslear, Robert Wilson, and John Kidd. Quantification of the Sensitivity of Two Prevalent Track Inspection Systems. Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-17/03. United States. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2017. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37340.
Al-Nazer, Leith, et al. Quantification of the Sensitivity of Two Prevalent Track Inspection Systems. United States. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2017, Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-17/03, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37340.
This report uses signal detection theory to quantify the sensitivity of two common track inspection systems (manual visual inspection via a hi-rail vehicle and automated track geometry inspection). Quantifying the sensitivity of such systems can provide baseline input data for risk-based, probabilistic track inspection programs, which cannot determine optimal track inspection methodologies without accurate probabilities of detection for various track inspection methods. The results show that there are no overall differences in sensitivity (ability to detect deteriorated or anomalous track conditions) between visual and automated inspection methods. However, there is a strong bias with both systems to indicate “no defect,” which results in a high rate of misses of deteriorated and anomalous track conditions.
Al-Nazer, L., Raslear, T., Wilson, R., & Kidd, J. (2017). Quantification of the Sensitivity of Two Prevalent Track Inspection Systems (Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-17/03). United States. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37340
Al-Nazer, Leith, Thomas Raslear, Robert Wilson, and John Kidd. Quantification of the Sensitivity of Two Prevalent Track Inspection Systems. Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-17/03. United States. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2017. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37340.
Al-Nazer, Leith, et al. Quantification of the Sensitivity of Two Prevalent Track Inspection Systems. United States. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2017, Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-17/03, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37340.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.