Rupnow, T. (2015). Comparison of conventional and self-consolidating concrete for drilled shaft construction : [tech summary] (Report No. SIO No. 30000681;LTRC Project No. 12-5C). Louisiana Transportation Research Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/28834
Rupnow, Tyson. Comparison of conventional and self-consolidating concrete for drilled shaft construction : [tech summary]. Report no. SIO No. 30000681;LTRC Project No. 12-5C. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, 2015. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/28834.
Rupnow, Tyson Comparison of conventional and self-consolidating concrete for drilled shaft construction : [tech summary]. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, 2015, Report no. SIO No. 30000681;LTRC Project No. 12-5C, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/28834.
Significant anomalies have been observed in many of the recent drilled shaft construction projects throughout Louisiana.
;
The anomalies typically occur in the form of honeycombing within the zones of heavy reinforcement or sometimes at the
;
shaft bottom. Self-Consolidating Concrete (SCC) has shown great potential to overcome the difficulties as noted in some
;
pilot studies. For example, SCC was used in the drilled shafts for the Huey P. Long Bridge in New Orleans and performed
;
satisfactorily. In contrast to the Huey P. Long Bridge, conventional concrete was used for the Audubon Bridge. Problems
;
were noted in the construction as well as the shaft resistance. Both projects consist of large size shafts constructed in the
;
Mississippi River in similar conditions.
;
This project was undertaken to determine the use of SCC and various test methods to assess the suitability of SCC in
;
underwater placement conditions.
Rupnow, T. (2015). Comparison of conventional and self-consolidating concrete for drilled shaft construction : [tech summary] (Report No. SIO No. 30000681;LTRC Project No. 12-5C). Louisiana Transportation Research Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/28834
Rupnow, Tyson. Comparison of conventional and self-consolidating concrete for drilled shaft construction : [tech summary]. Report no. SIO No. 30000681;LTRC Project No. 12-5C. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, 2015. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/28834.
Rupnow, Tyson Comparison of conventional and self-consolidating concrete for drilled shaft construction : [tech summary]. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, 2015, Report no. SIO No. 30000681;LTRC Project No. 12-5C, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/28834.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.