Comparison of Conventional and Self-Consolidating Concrete for Drilled Shaft Construction : Research Project Capsule
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Comparison of Conventional and Self-Consolidating Concrete for Drilled Shaft Construction : Research Project Capsule

Filetype[PDF-131.42 KB]


English
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Corporate Creators:
    Louisiana Transportation Research Center
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    12-5C
  • Resource Type:
    Booklet/Pamphlet
  • Geographical Coverage:
    Louisiana
  • Edition:
    Research project capsule.
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Louisiana Transportation Research Center
  • Abstract:
    Signifi cant anomalies have been observed in many of the recently drilled shaft constructions

    throughout Louisiana. The anomalies typically occur in the form of honeycombing within the

    zones of heavy reinforcement or sometimes at the shaft bottom. Self-consolidating concrete

    (SCC) has shown great potential to overcome the diffi culties noted in some pilot studies. As

    an example, SCC was used in the drilled shafts for the Huey P. Long Bridge in New Orleans, La,

    and performed satisfactorily. However, when conventional concrete was used for the Audubon

    Bridge in Louisiana, problems were noted in the construction as well as the shaft resistance. Both

    projects consist of large size shafts constructed in the Mississippi River under similar conditions.

    One possible explanation for the diff erences in shaft performance is the concrete mixture design.

  • Format:
    PDF
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov