A hierarchical typology of intermodal air-rail connections at large airports in the United States.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

A hierarchical typology of intermodal air-rail connections at large airports in the United States.

Filetype[PDF-2.34 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      In July 2005, the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report discussing

      intermodal transportation strategies in developing airport intermodal capabilities (USGAO 2005). In this

      report, the GAO identified those airports that had a direct rail or bus connection, to either nationwide or

      local systems, among the largest 72 US airports. GAO found 13 airports directly connected to

      nationwide rail (the Amtrak system), and 27 airports directly connected to local or regional rail systems

      (see Figure 1). The GAO “considered a direct connection to consist of a transfer point (such as a bus

      stop or rail station) that is accessible from airport terminals either by walking, an automated people

      mover, or direct shuttle” (USGAO 2005, p. 7).

      Unfortunately, the GAO definition of a “direct” intermodal connection did not distinguish among

      numerous important characteristics that define the quality of an intermodal air-rail linkage. For

      example, there is a huge difference between service provided at an on-airport rail station that is

      accessible by walking as opposed to having to take a shuttle to an off-airport rail station. There are

      differences in the type and length of shuttle services between airports and rail stations. Likewise, rail service at an airport that connects to a national rail system is different from service that is only local or

      regional. Also, airport rail service that is more frequent and connected to a large rail system is much

      different from rail service that is infrequent and may only feature one line of service with limited

      connectivity. All of these factors must be considered when assessing the quality of air-rail connections.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26