Evaluation of the in-service safety performance of safety-shape and vertical concrete barriers.
-
2011-12-16
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final report; 2005-2011.
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:Roadside concrete barriers have been widely used to protect errant motorists from hitting ; roadside hazards or obstacles. Two concrete barrier profiles, vertical and safety-shape, have been used ; for this purpose. The safety-shape profile has been shown to produce excessive vehicle climbing which ; tends to increase rollover propensity. On the other hand, the vertical profile does not cause vehicle ; climbing, but it does produce higher lateral forces which may produce higher injury levels. ; The objective of this research is to investigate which barrier profile is the safest based on realworld ; vehicle crash data. The safest barrier profile is defined as the one that produces lower injury ; levels. Rollover propensity was also used as a second indicator of barrier performance since rollovers ; may also affect injury severity. ; Bridge-related crash data was collected from State maintained highways in the State of Iowa. It ; was found that rollovers are twice more likely to occur in crashes involving safety-shape barriers as ; compared to vertical barriers. It was also found that crashes that involved safety-shape barriers resulted ; in higher injury levels as compared to crashes that involved the vertical barriers. Therefore, it is ; believed that the expanded use of vertical barriers would improve overall highway safety.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:2d07f0ca0d32238161cea2707f7ff5caa9ebd9590102ea04d19302711cd0da74