Recent Additions

This page includes the documents that were newly added to the repository within the last 30 days.

All these words:

This exact word or phrase:

Any of these words:

None of these words:

Language:

Publication Date Range:

Visit our Help Page for additional assistance

Select a Range:

Select a Format:

Custom Search Builder:

Custom Search Box

Visit our Help Page for additional assistance

Showing 141 - 160 of 427 results

Revised Policy for the Approval of Buy America Waivers [Memorandum]

Horne, Dwight

2008-03-13 | Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance | PDF

This memorandum rescinds my July 3, 2003 memorandum titled "Re-Delegation of Buy America Waiver Approval Guidance." Effectively immediately, all Buy America waiver requests must be submitted for review and consideration by this office. This change is necessitated by a provision in Public Law 110-161, the "Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008." Div ...

08/17/2026

Title : Revised Policy for the Approval of Buy America Waivers [Memorandum] Creator(s) : Horne, Dwight Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 2008-03-13 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93007
Horne, Dwight (2008). Revised Policy for the Approval of Buy America Waivers [Memorandum].

Horne, Dwight "Revised Policy for the Approval of Buy America Waivers [Memorandum]" (2008)

Horne, Dwight "Revised Policy for the Approval of Buy America Waivers [Memorandum]" , 2008
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum AU - Horne, Dwight A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - This memorandum rescinds my July 3, 2003 memorandum titled "Re-Delegation of Buy America Waiver Approval Guidance." Effectively immediately, all Buy America waiver requests must be submitted for review and consideration by this office. This change is necessitated by a provision in Public Law 110-161, the "Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008." Division K, Section 130 of this law states: "Not less than 15 days prior to waiving, under her statutory authority, any Buy America requirement for Federal-aid highway projects, the Secretary of Transportation shall make an informal public notice and comment opportunity on the intent to issue such waiver and the reasons therefore: Provided, That the Secretary shall provide an annual report to the appropriations Committees of the Congress on any waivers granted under the Buy America requirements. "Due to the statutory requirement for the Secretary of Transportation to implement an informal public notice and comment opportunity for each waiver, it is necessary for all waiver requests to be submitted to this office for review. We have established an internet Web page titled: "Notice of Buy America Waiver Request" (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/waivers.cfm) to provide notification and the opportunity for public comment for every Buy America waiver. We encourage interested parties to subscribe to this notification system to receive a notice regarding current waiver requests. While the statute provides for a minimum 15-day comment period, contracting agencies should recognize that coordination activities following the comment period may result in a waiver decision more than 15 days after the initial posting. AN - dot:93007 KW - Procurement KW - Steel KW - Iron KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration PY - 2008-03-13 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance TI - Revised Policy for the Approval of Buy America Waivers [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93007 ER - DB - ROSA P
Service Life and Cost Comparisons for Four Types of CDOT Bridge Decks

Hearn, George ;

Xi, Yunping

2007-09-01 | PDF

This study examines costs and performance of four types of reinforced concrete bridge decks currently in service on Colorado DOT(CDOT) highway bridges. These four types allow a comparison between bare decks and decks with waterproofing membranes, and between decks with uncoated steel reinforcement and decks with epoxy-coated steel reinforcement. Hi ...

08/17/2026

Title : Service Life and Cost Comparisons for Four Types of CDOT Bridge Decks Creator(s) : Hearn, George;Xi, Yunping; Corporate Creator(s) : University of Colorado. Dept. of Civil Engineering Corporate Contributor(s) : Colorado Department of Transportation. Office of Applied Research;United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration; Published Date : 2007-09-01 Report Number : CDOT-2007-2 URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93006
Hearn, George and Xi, Yunping (2007). Service Life and Cost Comparisons for Four Types of CDOT Bridge Decks.

Hearn, George and Xi, Yunping "Service Life and Cost Comparisons for Four Types of CDOT Bridge Decks" (2007)

Hearn, George and Xi, Yunping "Service Life and Cost Comparisons for Four Types of CDOT Bridge Decks" , 2007
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Tech Report AU - Hearn, George AU - Xi, Yunping A2 - University of Colorado. Dept. of Civil Engineering A3 - Colorado Department of Transportation. Office of Applied Research A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration AB - This study examines costs and performance of four types of reinforced concrete bridge decks currently in service on Colorado DOT(CDOT) highway bridges. These four types allow a comparison between bare decks and decks with waterproofing membranes, and between decks with uncoated steel reinforcement and decks with epoxy-coated steel reinforcement. Histories of deck condition ratings are used to estimate deck service life and to generate population models of service life. Decks with waterproofing membrane have longer service life than bare decks. Condition data indicate longer service life for decks with uncoated reinforcing steel, but this outcome may be due to the limited extent of condition data for decks having epoxy-coated reinforcement. Costs for bridge decks are evaluated as initial costs, present values, and annualized costs. By all present value and annualized cost measures, decks with waterproofing membrane are least expensive. This outcome is not sensitive to the value of the discount factor. AN - dot:93006 ET - Final Report: Sept. 1, 2005 to Nov. 30, 2006 KW - Service life KW - Life cycle costing KW - Bridge decks KW - Epoxy coatings KW - Performance KW - Reinforced concrete KW - Reinforcing bars KW - Waterproofing materials KW - Annualized costs LA - English PB - Colorado Department of Transportation. Applied Research & Innovations Branch PY - 2007-09-01 SN - CDOT-2007-2 TI - Service Life and Cost Comparisons for Four Types of CDOT Bridge Decks M3 - Tech Report N1 - United States N1 - PG HAA 05HQ257 UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93006 ER - DB - ROSA P
Buy America Interpretation [Memorandum]

Gee, King W.

2011-06-13 | Memoranda & Guidance: Information | PDF

This is in response to your February 24, 2011 memorandum that requested our concurrence in the position your office has developed regarding the applicability of Buy America provisions to steel casings used in micropile construction. We agree with your position that since the casings are permanently incorporated into the project, the Buy America pro ...

08/17/2026

Title : Buy America Interpretation [Memorandum] Creator(s) : Gee, King W. Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 2011-06-13 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Information URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93005
Gee, King W. (2011). Buy America Interpretation [Memorandum].

Gee, King W. "Buy America Interpretation [Memorandum]" (2011)

Gee, King W. "Buy America Interpretation [Memorandum]" , 2011
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum AU - Gee, King W. A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - This is in response to your February 24, 2011 memorandum that requested our concurrence in the position your office has developed regarding the applicability of Buy America provisions to steel casings used in micropile construction. We agree with your position that since the casings are permanently incorporated into the project, the Buy America provisions apply.. See Question and Answer No. 19: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_qa.cfm. AN - dot:93005 KW - Procurement KW - Construction projects KW - Federal aid KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure PY - 2011-06-13 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Information TI - Buy America Interpretation [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93005 ER - DB - ROSA P
12/20/12 Letter to John Horsley

Mendez, Victor M.

2012-12-20 | PDF

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) appreciates the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) resolution to expedite the review of Buy America requirements related to utility work on Federal-aid projects, which the Standing Committee on Highways approved at the 2012 Spring Business Meeting. In this resolutio ...

08/17/2026

Title : 12/20/12 Letter to John Horsley Creator(s) : Mendez, Victor M. Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration Corporate Contributor(s) : American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Published Date : 2012-12-20 URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93004
Mendez, Victor M. (2012). 12/20/12 Letter to John Horsley.

Mendez, Victor M. "12/20/12 Letter to John Horsley" (2012)

Mendez, Victor M. "12/20/12 Letter to John Horsley" , 2012
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Letter AU - Mendez, Victor M. A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration A3 - American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) AB - The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) appreciates the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) resolution to expedite the review of Buy America requirements related to utility work on Federal-aid projects, which the Standing Committee on Highways approved at the 2012 Spring Business Meeting. In this resolution, the Standing Committee on Highways resolved that it supports the FHWA's efforts to reassess the applicability of Buy America requirements to utility work on Federal-aid projects and requested that FHWA expedite the completion of its review of third party utility property rights and whether these rights exempt them from Buy America. AN - dot:93004 KW - Federal aid KW - Government funding KW - Public utilities KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration PY - 2012-12-20 TI - 12/20/12 Letter to John Horsley M3 - Letter N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93004 ER - DB - ROSA P
Challenging Mis/Disinformation in Special Libraries in an Age of AI and Alternative Facts

Saunders, Laura

2026-08-13 | MPEG

Associate Dean and Professor Laura Saunders, with Simmons University's School of Library and Information Science, is the speaker for the August 2026 Transportation Librarians Roundtable. Saunders addresses how mis- and disinformation have infiltrated all parts of our lives, emphasizing the ways in which AI tools complicate the knowledge management ...

08/17/2026

Supporting Files

Title : Challenging Mis/Disinformation in Special Libraries in an Age of AI and Alternative Facts Creator(s) : Saunders, Laura Corporate Creator(s) : Simmons University. School of Library and Information Science Corporate Contributor(s) : American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO);National Transportation Knowledge Network (NTKN) (U.S.); Published Date : 2026-08-13 DOI : https://doi.org/10.21949/dm7k-3t48
Saunders, Laura (2026). Challenging Mis/Disinformation in Special Libraries in an Age of AI and Alternative Facts. https://doi.org/10.21949/dm7k-3t48

Saunders, Laura "Challenging Mis/Disinformation in Special Libraries in an Age of AI and Alternative Facts" (2026), https://doi.org/10.21949/dm7k-3t48

Saunders, Laura "Challenging Mis/Disinformation in Special Libraries in an Age of AI and Alternative Facts" , 2026, https://doi.org/10.21949/dm7k-3t48
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Presentations AU - Saunders, Laura A2 - Simmons University. School of Library and Information Science A3 - American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A3 - National Transportation Knowledge Network (NTKN) (U.S.) AB - Associate Dean and Professor Laura Saunders, with Simmons University's School of Library and Information Science, is the speaker for the August 2026 Transportation Librarians Roundtable. Saunders addresses how mis- and disinformation have infiltrated all parts of our lives, emphasizing the ways in which AI tools complicate the knowledge management landscape by increasing the ease with which false information is created and spread. After an overview of the mis/disinformation terrain, Simmons provides specific, research-based strategies for verifying information online and using AI tools effectively. AB - Recording length: 1h 03m 09s. Gemini AI was used to perform a light verbatim edit on the transcript. AN - dot:93003 DO - https://doi.org/10.21949/dm7k-3t48 KW - Artificial intelligence KW - Information dissemination and retrieval KW - Information services KW - Information, data, and knowledge KW - Guides to information KW - Information literacy KW - Misinformation KW - Disinformation LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. National Transportation Library PY - 2026-08-13 TI - Challenging Mis/Disinformation in Special Libraries in an Age of AI and Alternative Facts M3 - Presentations N1 - United States UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93003 ER - DB - ROSA P
Application of Buy America to non FHWA-funded Utility Relocations [Memorandum]

Shepherd, Gloria

2013-07-11 | Memoranda & Guidance: Information | PDF

In Section 1518 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Congress amended existing law to broaden the applicability of Buy America to non FHWA-funded utility relocations. For FHWA-funded projects, Buy America now applies to all contracts within the scope of a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) determination and eligi ...

08/17/2026

Title : Application of Buy America to non FHWA-funded Utility Relocations [Memorandum] Creator(s) : Shepherd, Gloria Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 2013-07-11 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Information URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93002
Shepherd, Gloria (2013). Application of Buy America to non FHWA-funded Utility Relocations [Memorandum].

Shepherd, Gloria "Application of Buy America to non FHWA-funded Utility Relocations [Memorandum]" (2013)

Shepherd, Gloria "Application of Buy America to non FHWA-funded Utility Relocations [Memorandum]" , 2013
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum AU - Shepherd, Gloria A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - In Section 1518 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Congress amended existing law to broaden the applicability of Buy America to non FHWA-funded utility relocations. For FHWA-funded projects, Buy America now applies to all contracts within the scope of a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) determination and eligible for assistance under title 23, United States Code, so long as one such contract is funded by FHWA. That is, if a project receives FHWA funding for any development or construction activities, including NEPA studies, right-of-way acquisition, preliminary engineering, or construction, Buy America applies to all contracts within the scope of the NEPA determination regardless of whether the contract uses FHWA funding. AN - dot:93002 KW - Environmental policy KW - Contract administration KW - Government funding KW - Federal aid KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration PY - 2013-07-11 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Information TI - Application of Buy America to non FHWA-funded Utility Relocations [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93002 ER - DB - ROSA P
Materials Recycling and Reuse - Finding Opportunities in Colorado Highways

Stevens, Michelle

2007-10-01 | PDF

The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) secured a Resource Conservation Grant provided by the U.S. EPA to determine a strategy to improve recycling on highway projects and reduce waste in landfills. The project focused primarily on five high-tonnage materials: asphalt, concrete, metal, wood, and tires. These materials can be reused, recycl ...

08/17/2026

Title : Materials Recycling and Reuse - Finding Opportunities in Colorado Highways Creator(s) : Stevens, Michelle Corporate Creator(s) : Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Corporate Contributor(s) : Colorado Department of Transportation. Office of Applied Research;United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration;United States. Environmental Protection Agency; Published Date : 2007-10-01 URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93001
Stevens, Michelle (2007). Materials Recycling and Reuse - Finding Opportunities in Colorado Highways.

Stevens, Michelle "Materials Recycling and Reuse - Finding Opportunities in Colorado Highways" (2007)

Stevens, Michelle "Materials Recycling and Reuse - Finding Opportunities in Colorado Highways" , 2007
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Tech Report AU - Stevens, Michelle A2 - Felsburg Holt & Ullevig A3 - Colorado Department of Transportation. Office of Applied Research A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration A3 - United States. Environmental Protection Agency AB - The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) secured a Resource Conservation Grant provided by the U.S. EPA to determine a strategy to improve recycling on highway projects and reduce waste in landfills. The project focused primarily on five high-tonnage materials: asphalt, concrete, metal, wood, and tires. These materials can be reused, recycled, and replaced on highway projects in cost-effective ways. Recommendations include: • Increase the percent of RAP allowed in highway asphalt pavement projects from 15% to 30%; • Use crushed concrete for more project applications; • Replace wood products with more recycle-friendly products such as steel and plastic; • Replace raw materials with steel products made from recycled steel; • Increase use of rubber tire products in engineering applications; • Modify construction specifications and improve tracking to both increase and measure efforts; and • Present findings to engineers and DOT designers responsible for materials selection in project design. AN - dot:93001 ET - Final Report KW - Reclaimed asphalt pavements KW - Recycled materials KW - Aggregate mixtures KW - Concrete aggregates KW - Tires KW - Plastics KW - Steel KW - Solid waste disposal KW - Landfills KW - Wood KW - Raw materials KW - alternative materials KW - recycled concrete aggregate KW - waste tires KW - solid waste reduction LA - English PB - Colorado Department of Transportation. Applied Research & Innovations Branch PY - 2007-10-01 TI - Materials Recycling and Reuse - Finding Opportunities in Colorado Highways M3 - Tech Report N1 - United States N1 - CDOT-2007-12 UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93001 ER - DB - ROSA P
Transfer of Funds for Transit Projects [Memorandum]

Wagner, Fred R. ;

Carter, Dorval R. Jr.

2013-12-11 | Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance | PDF

This memorandum expresses the Department of Transportation's preference that Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program and Surface Transportation Program funds used for projects to purchase transit vehicles be administered by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Because FTA's Buy America rule has provisions specific to r ...

08/17/2026

Title : Transfer of Funds for Transit Projects [Memorandum] Creator(s) : Wagner, Fred R.;Carter, Dorval R. Jr.; Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration;United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Transit Administration; Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 2013-12-11 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93000
Wagner, Fred R. and Carter, Dorval R. Jr. (2013). Transfer of Funds for Transit Projects [Memorandum].

Wagner, Fred R. and Carter, Dorval R. Jr. "Transfer of Funds for Transit Projects [Memorandum]" (2013)

Wagner, Fred R. and Carter, Dorval R. Jr. "Transfer of Funds for Transit Projects [Memorandum]" , 2013
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum AU - Wagner, Fred R. AU - Carter, Dorval R. Jr. A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Transit Administration A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - This memorandum expresses the Department of Transportation's preference that Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program and Surface Transportation Program funds used for projects to purchase transit vehicles be administered by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Because FTA's Buy America rule has provisions specific to rolling stock procurements, the administration of funds through FTA will reduce the need for Buy America waivers. AN - dot:93000 KW - Public transit KW - Financing KW - Procurement KW - Traffic congestion KW - Air quality KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration PY - 2013-12-11 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance TI - Transfer of Funds for Transit Projects [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93000 ER - DB - ROSA P
Buy America Requirements 1983 [Memorandum]

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration

1983-11-25 | Memoranda & Guidance: Information | PDF

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is amending its Buy America regulation to implement procedures required by section 165 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) 1982 (Pub. L. 97-424). Section 165 provides with exceptions that funds authorized for Federal-aid highway projects may not be obligated unless the steel, cement, and man ...

08/17/2026

Title : Buy America Requirements 1983 [Memorandum] Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 1983-11-25 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Information URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92999
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration (1983). Buy America Requirements 1983 [Memorandum].

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration "Buy America Requirements 1983 [Memorandum]" (1983)

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration "Buy America Requirements 1983 [Memorandum]" , 1983
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is amending its Buy America regulation to implement procedures required by section 165 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) 1982 (Pub. L. 97-424). Section 165 provides with exceptions that funds authorized for Federal-aid highway projects may not be obligated unless the steel, cement, and manufactured products used in such projects are produced in the United States. The amendments are based on a review of comments received in response to an interim final rule (January 17, 1983) (48 FR 1946) and to amendments to that interim final rule (May 26, 1983) (48 FR 23631) which were issued to temporarily implement section 165. The final rule provides for application of the revised Buy America provisions to steel and cement regardless of project cost. The waiver exempting manufactured products other than steel and cement contained in the January 17, 1983, interim final rule is retained. AN - dot:92999 KW - Federal aid highways KW - Purchasing KW - Regulations KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration PY - 1983-11-25 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Information TI - Buy America Requirements 1983 [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92999 ER - DB - ROSA P
Deviation From Competitive Bidding [Memorandum]

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration

1985-04-30 | Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance | PDF

Recently, several member State agencies of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials have asked us to consider changing our requirements on competitive bidding to allow negotiation of construction contracts with apparent low bidders. The States indicate that this change would be in the public interest because it would l ...

08/17/2026

Title : Deviation From Competitive Bidding [Memorandum] Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 1985-04-30 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92998
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration (1985). Deviation From Competitive Bidding [Memorandum].

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration "Deviation From Competitive Bidding [Memorandum]" (1985)

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration "Deviation From Competitive Bidding [Memorandum]" , 1985
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - Recently, several member State agencies of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials have asked us to consider changing our requirements on competitive bidding to allow negotiation of construction contracts with apparent low bidders. The States indicate that this change would be in the public interest because it would lead to lower prices and reduce the potential for bid rigging. In view of this interest, we have reviewed Federal law covering competitive bidding as well as the Federal Highway Administration's policy in this area. As a result of this review, we have concluded that the legal requirements of Section 112 of Title 23, United States Code, do not permit negotiation of prices with apparent low bidders. Under Section 112 and the regulations we issued to implement it one of the most basic requirements is that the State highway agency must maintain nondiscriminatory procedures for inviting bids. These procedures should be free of requirements restricting competitive bidding on construction contracts. Bids must be opened publicly and the results announced. After tabulation and examination of the bids for errors, irregularities, responsibility, and responsiveness, the State highway agency must either accept or reject the bid. AN - dot:92998 KW - Contract administration KW - Contracting KW - Competitive bidding KW - Federal aid KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration PY - 1985-04-30 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance TI - Deviation From Competitive Bidding [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92998 ER - DB - ROSA P
Bidding Procedures - Negotiations with Bidders [Memorandum]

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration

1986-06-23 | Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance | PDF

The Georgia proposed special provision furnished with your May 28 memorandum is not acceptable for use on Federal-aid projects. We fully concur with your position that negotiations with bidders as proposed by the State shall not be permitted on Federal-aid contracts.

08/17/2026

Title : Bidding Procedures - Negotiations with Bidders [Memorandum] Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 1986-06-23 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92997
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration (1986). Bidding Procedures - Negotiations with Bidders [Memorandum].

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration "Bidding Procedures - Negotiations with Bidders [Memorandum]" (1986)

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration "Bidding Procedures - Negotiations with Bidders [Memorandum]" , 1986
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - The Georgia proposed special provision furnished with your May 28 memorandum is not acceptable for use on Federal-aid projects. We fully concur with your position that negotiations with bidders as proposed by the State shall not be permitted on Federal-aid contracts. AN - dot:92997 KW - Competitive bidding KW - Federal aid KW - Contract administration KW - Contracting KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration PY - 1986-06-23 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance TI - Bidding Procedures - Negotiations with Bidders [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92997 ER - DB - ROSA P
Tennessee Special Provision (SP) Regarding Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum]

United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations

1986-07-10 | Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance | PDF

The Tennessee Department of Transportation's proposed "Special Provision Regarding Unbalanced Bids) SP 102B," submitted by your memorandum of June 25, 1986, is not acceptable for use on Federal-aid projects. The SP does not provide an unencumbered competitive bidding process in keeping with the Federal Highway Administration's competitive bidding p ...

08/17/2026

Title : Tennessee Special Provision (SP) Regarding Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum] Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 1986-07-10 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92996
United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations (1986). Tennessee Special Provision (SP) Regarding Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum].

United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations "Tennessee Special Provision (SP) Regarding Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum]" (1986)

United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations "Tennessee Special Provision (SP) Regarding Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum]" , 1986
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum A2 - United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - The Tennessee Department of Transportation's proposed "Special Provision Regarding Unbalanced Bids) SP 102B," submitted by your memorandum of June 25, 1986, is not acceptable for use on Federal-aid projects. The SP does not provide an unencumbered competitive bidding process in keeping with the Federal Highway Administration's competitive bidding policy. The deferral of payment as provided in the SP, for unit prices judged to be unbalanced, after the opening of bids is improper. It puts the bidding contractor in the difficult position of developing a bid under conditions which may subsequently be unilaterally altered by the State. If a bid (balanced or unbalanced) is accepted for award, changes in unit prices or payment schedules either unilaterally by the State or through negotiations should not be attempted. Such actions tend to erode the competitive bidding process. AN - dot:92996 KW - Federal aid KW - Contracting KW - Competitive bidding KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations PY - 1986-07-10 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance TI - Tennessee Special Provision (SP) Regarding Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92996 ER - DB - ROSA P
Rejection of Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum]

Green, M. Eldon

1987-07-29 | Memoranda & Guidance: Information | PDF

Assistant Regional Counsel Lawrence Hanf has recently prepared the attached position paper regarding the rejection of unbalanced bids. The conclusion is basically that unbalanced bids are not allowed under the following circumstances : l. If there is a specific clause in the contract prohibiting unbalanced bidding and the Government can show that t ...

08/17/2026

Title : Rejection of Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum] Creator(s) : Green, M. Eldon Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 1987-07-29 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Information URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92995
Green, M. Eldon (1987). Rejection of Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum].

Green, M. Eldon "Rejection of Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum]" (1987)

Green, M. Eldon "Rejection of Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum]" , 1987
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum AU - Green, M. Eldon A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - Assistant Regional Counsel Lawrence Hanf has recently prepared the attached position paper regarding the rejection of unbalanced bids. The conclusion is basically that unbalanced bids are not allowed under the following circumstances : l. If there is a specific clause in the contract prohibiting unbalanced bidding and the Government can show that the bid was mathematically unbalanced; or 2. If the contractor grossly front-end loads its bid so as to amount to an advance payment or an interest-free loan; or 3. If the unbalancing of the bid on an option contract or an estimated quantities contract with an unreliable estimate, creates a reasonable doubt that the apparent low bid will actually result in the lowest cost to the Government. AN - dot:92995 KW - Bids KW - Competitive bidding KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration PY - 1987-07-29 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Information TI - Rejection of Unbalanced Bids [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92995 ER - DB - ROSA P
Study on the Effects of Mixture Proportioning on the Strength and Cracking Tendency of S50 Structural Concrete

Kiousis, Panos D. ;

Whitcomb, Brent L.

2007-11-01 | PDF

Based on the study presented in this report, it was determined that S50 structural concrete can be produced to meet the requirements of the CDOT Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Construction, Section 601. S50 mixes using cement as well as cement/fly ash blends can be successfully produced with the aid of proper high-range water-reducing ( ...

08/17/2026

Title : Study on the Effects of Mixture Proportioning on the Strength and Cracking Tendency of S50 Structural Concrete Creator(s) : Kiousis, Panos D.;Whitcomb, Brent L.;O'Connor, Brian;Schmidt, Kaitlin;Chen, Abe;Reindl, Greg;Jones, Justin; Corporate Creator(s) : Colorado School of Mines Corporate Contributor(s) : Colorado. Department of Transportation. Applied Research & Innovations Branch;United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration; Published Date : 2007-11-01 Report Number : CDOT-2007-15 URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92994
Kiousis, Panos D. et al. (2007). Study on the Effects of Mixture Proportioning on the Strength and Cracking Tendency of S50 Structural Concrete.

Kiousis, Panos D. et al. "Study on the Effects of Mixture Proportioning on the Strength and Cracking Tendency of S50 Structural Concrete" (2007)

Kiousis, Panos D. et al. "Study on the Effects of Mixture Proportioning on the Strength and Cracking Tendency of S50 Structural Concrete" , 2007
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Tech Report AU - Kiousis, Panos D. AU - Whitcomb, Brent L. AU - O'Connor, Brian AU - Schmidt, Kaitlin AU - Chen, Abe AU - Reindl, Greg AU - Jones, Justin A2 - Colorado School of Mines A3 - Colorado. Department of Transportation. Applied Research & Innovations Branch A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration AB - Based on the study presented in this report, it was determined that S50 structural concrete can be produced to meet the requirements of the CDOT Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Construction, Section 601. S50 mixes using cement as well as cement/fly ash blends can be successfully produced with the aid of proper high-range water-reducing (HRWR) admixtures. The low w/cm ratios used in this study allow the development of a high-strength structural concrete and low drying shrinkage, while retaining air content between 5% and 8% for freeze/thaw durability. AN - dot:92994 ET - Final Report KW - Concrete structures KW - Drying KW - Shrinkage KW - Admixtures KW - Fly ash KW - Tests KW - Freeze thaw durability KW - high-strength structural concrete KW - drying shrinkage KW - high-range water-reducing (HRWR) KW - ring tests LA - English PB - Colorado Department of Transportation. Applied Research & Innovations Branch PY - 2007-11-01 SN - CDOT-2007-15 TI - Study on the Effects of Mixture Proportioning on the Strength and Cracking Tendency of S50 Structural Concrete M3 - Tech Report N1 - United States UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92994 ER - DB - ROSA P
Q&As for Build America, Buy America (BABA) Implementation Plan to Enhance Buy America for Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration

2023-07-11 | PDF

On February 21, 2023, FHWA issued the BABA Implementation Plan to Enhance Buy America for EV Chargers to enable EV charger acquisition and installation to immediately proceed while also ensuring the application of Buy America to EV chargers by the phasing of requirements over time. The Implementation Plan consists of a Limited Waiver of Buy America ...

08/17/2026

Title : Q&As for Build America, Buy America (BABA) Implementation Plan to Enhance Buy America for Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 2023-07-11 URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92993
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration (2023). Q&As for Build America, Buy America (BABA) Implementation Plan to Enhance Buy America for Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers.

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration "Q&As for Build America, Buy America (BABA) Implementation Plan to Enhance Buy America for Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers" (2023)

United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration "Q&As for Build America, Buy America (BABA) Implementation Plan to Enhance Buy America for Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers" , 2023
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Brief A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - On February 21, 2023, FHWA issued the BABA Implementation Plan to Enhance Buy America for EV Chargers to enable EV charger acquisition and installation to immediately proceed while also ensuring the application of Buy America to EV chargers by the phasing of requirements over time. The Implementation Plan consists of a Limited Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers, which waives the application of FHWA's Buy America requirements for steel, iron, and manufactured products under 23 U.S.C. 313 and the construction materials requirement under § 70914 of the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) (Pub. L. 117-58, div. G §§ 70901-52) (collectively referred to as "Buy America requirements") to EV chargers under certain conditions. Prior to issuing the Implementation Plan, EV chargers were covered by FHWA's Buy America General Waiver for Manufactured Products. In addition, Buy America requirements applied to any predominantly steel or iron component of an EV charger regardless of the overall composition of the EV charger. FHWA developed the Implementation Plan to clarify Buy America requirements for EV chargers and encourage the domestic EV charger industry to ramp up production. The Implementation Plan consists of three key components. First, it removes EV chargers from the Manufactured Products General Waiver. Second, it waives Buy America steel and iron requirements except for predominately steel or iron housing components. Third, it phases in Buy America coverage to give domestic EV manufacturers time to grow to meet demand for domestic EV chargers. Depending on when the EV charger is manufactured and installed, EV chargers covered by the Implementation Plan satisfy Buy America requirements if they conform with certain conditions laid out in the Implementation Plan. Accordingly, EV chargers that conform with the Implementation Plan may be used on FHWA projects without the need to obtain a project-specific waiver from FHWA. AN - dot:92993 KW - Electric vehicles KW - Battery chargers KW - Plan implementation KW - Steel KW - Iron LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration PY - 2023-07-11 TI - Q&As for Build America, Buy America (BABA) Implementation Plan to Enhance Buy America for Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers M3 - Brief N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92993 ER - DB - ROSA P
Innovative Contracting Practices Initiative and Special Experimental Project No. 14 [Memorandum]

United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations

1990-02-13 | Memoranda & Guidance: Information | PDF

In January 1988, a Transportation Research Board (TRB) task force was formed to explore innovative contracting practices. The task force, officially identified as Task Force A2T51 - Innovative Contracting Practices is comprised of representatives from a11 segments of the highwayindustry, including contractors, consultants, trade associations, suret ...

08/17/2026

Title : Innovative Contracting Practices Initiative and Special Experimental Project No. 14 [Memorandum] Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 1990-02-13 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Information URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92992
United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations (1990). Innovative Contracting Practices Initiative and Special Experimental Project No. 14 [Memorandum].

United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations "Innovative Contracting Practices Initiative and Special Experimental Project No. 14 [Memorandum]" (1990)

United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations "Innovative Contracting Practices Initiative and Special Experimental Project No. 14 [Memorandum]" , 1990
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum A2 - United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - In January 1988, a Transportation Research Board (TRB) task force was formed to explore innovative contracting practices. The task force, officially identified as Task Force A2T51 - Innovative Contracting Practices is comprised of representatives from a11 segments of the highway AB - industry, including contractors, consultants, trade associations, surety and bonding agents, academia, SHA's, and the FHWA. Its mission is to solicit, study, and compile information on the practices under which both U.S. and foreign agencies contract for construction as they affect quality progress, and costs; call attention to practices that inhibit quality construction along with ways to improve them; and suggest methods for improving contracting processes. AN - dot:92992 KW - Contracting KW - Research projects KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Highway Operations PY - 1990-02-13 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Information TI - Innovative Contracting Practices Initiative and Special Experimental Project No. 14 [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92992 ER - DB - ROSA P
Programmatic Approval of Alternate Pavement Type Bidding [Memorandum]

Baxter, John

2012-11-08 | Memoranda & Guidance: Information | PDF

Title 23 U.S.C. 112 provides that Federal-aid construction contracts shall be awarded only on the basis of the lowest responsive bid. Since 2000, FHWA has allowed the States to evaluate alternate pavement type bidding procedures with Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) bid adjustments under the authority of Special Experimental Project No. 14 (SEP-14) ...

08/17/2026

Title : Programmatic Approval of Alternate Pavement Type Bidding [Memorandum] Creator(s) : Baxter, John Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure Published Date : 2012-11-08 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Information URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92991
Baxter, John (2012). Programmatic Approval of Alternate Pavement Type Bidding [Memorandum].

Baxter, John "Programmatic Approval of Alternate Pavement Type Bidding [Memorandum]" (2012)

Baxter, John "Programmatic Approval of Alternate Pavement Type Bidding [Memorandum]" , 2012
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum AU - Baxter, John A2 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure AB - Title 23 U.S.C. 112 provides that Federal-aid construction contracts shall be awarded only on the basis of the lowest responsive bid. Since 2000, FHWA has allowed the States to evaluate alternate pavement type bidding procedures with Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) bid adjustments under the authority of Special Experimental Project No. 14 (SEP-14) - Innovative Contracting. Several SEP-14 workplans and evaluations for alternate pavement type bidding with LCCA adjustments are available on the SEP-14 Active Project List. AN - dot:92991 KW - Federal aid KW - Competitive bidding KW - Contracts KW - Pavements KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure PY - 2012-11-08 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Information TI - Programmatic Approval of Alternate Pavement Type Bidding [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92991 ER - DB - ROSA P
Procurement of Federal-aid Construction Projects Guidance [Memorandum]

Marrero, Moises

2024-04-12 | Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance | PDF

This guidance memorandum supersedes our June 26, 2008, memorandum on this subject with the same title. The revision is necessary to provide consistency with statutory revisions under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act (Pub. L. 112-141), the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (Pub. L. 114-94), and the Infr ...

08/17/2026

Title : Procurement of Federal-aid Construction Projects Guidance [Memorandum] Creator(s) : Marrero, Moises Corporate Creator(s) : United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Preconstruction, Construction, and Pavements Corporate Contributor(s) : United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center Published Date : 2024-04-12 Series : Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92990
Marrero, Moises (2024). Procurement of Federal-aid Construction Projects Guidance [Memorandum].

Marrero, Moises "Procurement of Federal-aid Construction Projects Guidance [Memorandum]" (2024)

Marrero, Moises "Procurement of Federal-aid Construction Projects Guidance [Memorandum]" , 2024
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Memorandum AU - Marrero, Moises A2 - United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Preconstruction, Construction, and Pavements A3 - United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Policy & Guidance Center AB - This guidance memorandum supersedes our June 26, 2008, memorandum on this subject with the same title. The revision is necessary to provide consistency with statutory revisions under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act (Pub. L. 112-141), the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (Pub. L. 114-94), and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 117-58, also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL)). AN - dot:92990 KW - Federal aid KW - Construction projects KW - Procurement KW - Policy KW - Recommendations LA - English PB - United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Preconstruction, Construction, and Pavements PY - 2024-04-12 T2 - Memoranda & Guidance: Guidance TI - Procurement of Federal-aid Construction Projects Guidance [Memorandum] M3 - Memorandum N1 - United States N1 - Public Domain UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92990 ER - DB - ROSA P
North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2026: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies

Vachal, Kimberly ;

Kubas, Andrew

2026-07-01 | PDF

The statewide driver traffic safety survey provides baseline and longitudinal metrics for the Highway Safety Division and others to use in understanding perceptions and self-reported behaviors related to focus issues. A core set of questions addresses nationally agreed upon priorities, including seat belts, impaired driving, and speeding. In additi ...

08/17/2026

Title : North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2026: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies Creator(s) : Vachal, Kimberly;Kubas, Andrew;Andersen, Jaclyn; Corporate Creator(s) : Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute Corporate Contributor(s) : North Dakota. Department of Transportation Published Date : 2026-07-01 Report Number : 334 URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92989
Vachal, Kimberly et al. (2026). North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2026: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies.

Vachal, Kimberly and Kubas, Andrew and Andersen, Jaclyn "North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2026: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies" (2026)

Vachal, Kimberly et al. "North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2026: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies" , 2026
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Tech Report AU - Vachal, Kimberly AU - Kubas, Andrew AU - Andersen, Jaclyn A2 - Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute A3 - North Dakota. Department of Transportation AB - The statewide driver traffic safety survey provides baseline and longitudinal metrics for the Highway Safety Division and others to use in understanding perceptions and self-reported behaviors related to focus issues. A core set of questions addresses nationally agreed upon priorities, including seat belts, impaired driving, and speeding. In addition to the core issues, questions were included to better understand views on specific programs and attitudes pertinent to North Dakota drivers. Results show that more North Dakota drivers have adopted safe driving practices, but additional efforts are needed to improve safety on the state's roads. AN - dot:92989 KW - Traffic safety KW - Surveys KW - Drunk driving KW - Seat belt use KW - Speeding KW - Performance measurement KW - State government agencies KW - Fatalities KW - Driving behavior KW - Crashes KW - Data collection LA - English PB - Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute PY - 2026-07-01 SN - 334 TI - North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2026: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies M3 - Tech Report N1 - United States UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92989 ER - DB - ROSA P
North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2020: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies

Vachal, Kimberly ;

Tchakounte-Wakem, Seguy

2020-10-01 | PDF

The statewide driver traffic safety survey provides baseline metrics for the Safety Division and others to use in understanding perceptions and self-reported behaviors related to focus issues. A core set of questions addresses nationally agreed upon priorities, including seat belts, impaired driving, and speeding. In addition to the core issues, qu ...

08/17/2026

Title : North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2020: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies Creator(s) : Vachal, Kimberly;Tchakounte-Wakem, Seguy;Kubas, Andrew; Corporate Creator(s) : North Dakota State University;Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute; Corporate Contributor(s) : North Dakota. Department of Transportation Published Date : 2020-10-01 Report Number : 309 URL : https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92988
Vachal, Kimberly et al. (2020). North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2020: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies.

Vachal, Kimberly and Tchakounte-Wakem, Seguy and Kubas, Andrew "North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2020: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies" (2020)

Vachal, Kimberly et al. "North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2020: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies" , 2020
Export RIS Citation Information. TY - Tech Report AU - Vachal, Kimberly AU - Tchakounte-Wakem, Seguy AU - Kubas, Andrew A2 - North Dakota State University A2 - Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute A3 - North Dakota. Department of Transportation AB - The statewide driver traffic safety survey provides baseline metrics for the Safety Division and others to use in understanding perceptions and self-reported behaviors related to focus issues. A core set of questions addresses nationally agreed upon priorities, including seat belts, impaired driving, and speeding. In addition to the core issues, questions were included to better understand views on specific programs and attitudes pertinent to North Dakota drivers. Results show that more North Dakota drivers have adopted safe driving practices, but additional efforts are needed to improve safety on the state's roads. AN - dot:92988 KW - Traffic safety KW - Surveys KW - Drunk driving KW - Seat belt use KW - Speeding KW - Performance measurement KW - State government agencies KW - Fatalities KW - Driving behavior KW - Crashes KW - Data collection LA - English PB - Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute PY - 2020-10-01 SN - 309 TI - North Dakota Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, 2020: Traffic Safety Performance Measures for State and Federal Agencies M3 - Tech Report N1 - United States UR - https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92988 ER - DB - ROSA P

Previous Page Previous

141 - 160 / 427

Next Page Next

Found an issue?

Send us an email at: