Stuart, C., Dersch, M. S., & Edwards, J. R. (2020). Timber Crosstie Spike Fastener Failure Investigation: Field Evaluation of an Alternative Fastener [Research Results] (Report No. RR 20-24). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54669
Stuart, Cameron, Marcus S. Dersch, and J. Riley Edwards. Timber Crosstie Spike Fastener Failure Investigation: Field Evaluation of an Alternative Fastener [Research Results]. Report no. RR 20-24. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2020. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54669.
Stuart, Cameron, et al. Timber Crosstie Spike Fastener Failure Investigation: Field Evaluation of an Alternative Fastener [Research Results]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2020, Report no. RR 20-24, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54669.
The Federal Railroad Administration has sponsored the Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Illinois) to conduct a comprehensive investigation into timber crosstie spike fastener failures on North American railroads. As a part of this project, researchers conducted a field evaluation of fastening systems and an accompanied modelling effort between September 2019 and June 2020. The field evaluation subjected control and alternative fastening systems to 170 million gross tons (MGT) of Heavy Axle Load (HAL) freight traffic at the Transportation Technology Center (TTC). The alternative system exhibited no component failures while the control system suffered multiple broken spikes. The results from this evaluation were compared with data from a finite element analysis (FEA) providing insight into the key fastener characteristic (i.e., tie-plate to crosstie clamping force) that likely lead to reduced spike stress and improved performance with the alternative fastening system.
Stuart, C., Dersch, M. S., & Edwards, J. R. (2020). Timber Crosstie Spike Fastener Failure Investigation: Field Evaluation of an Alternative Fastener [Research Results] (Report No. RR 20-24). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54669
Stuart, Cameron, Marcus S. Dersch, and J. Riley Edwards. Timber Crosstie Spike Fastener Failure Investigation: Field Evaluation of an Alternative Fastener [Research Results]. Report no. RR 20-24. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2020. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54669.
Stuart, Cameron, et al. Timber Crosstie Spike Fastener Failure Investigation: Field Evaluation of an Alternative Fastener [Research Results]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Railroad Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2020, Report no. RR 20-24, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54669.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.