Evaluation of Stay-in-Place Metal Forms: Executive Summary Report

Nims, Douglas; Grace, Nabil; University of Toledo. Dept. of Civil Engineering

Advanced Search

Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

Advanced Search
Custom Query

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Evaluation of Stay-in-Place Metal Forms: Executive Summary Report

2006-05-01
By Nims, Douglas ; Grace, Nabil

[PDF-238.03 KB]

English

Details You May Also Like

Details:

Creators:

Nims, Douglas ; Grace, Nabil

Nims, Douglas ; Grace, Nabil Less -
Corporate Creators:

University of Toledo. Dept. of Civil Engineering
Corporate Contributors:

Ohio. Dept. of Transportation
Subject/TRT Terms:

[+]

Bridge Decks Bridges And Other Structures Chlorides Compression Concrete Contractors Cores (Specimens) Design Ground Penetrating Radar Highways I24: Design Of Bridges And Retaining Walls Inspectors Permeability
Publication/ Report Number:

FHWA/OH-2006/13
Resource Type:

Brief
Geographical Coverage:

Ohio ; United States

Ohio ; United States Less -
Corporate Publisher:

Ohio. Dept. of Transportation
Abstract:

The primary objective of this study was to use an experimental study, literature review, and discussions with vendors and Departments of Transportation of the surrounding states to assess the impact of SIPMF on bridge deck concrete quality. Experimental studies were carried out on three northern Ohio bridge that were constructed approximately 40 years ago partially using SIPMF. The quality of the concrete in the regions with SIPMF was compared to the quality of the concrete in regions without SIPMF. The main disadvantage to using SIPMF is that the bottom of the bridge deck can not be visually inspected during construction or service. GPR is a fast safe nondestructive way to examine a bridge deck from the top side.
Format:

PDF
Funding:

State Job Number: 134155
Collection(s):

US Transportation Collection
Main Document Checksum:

[+]

urn:sha256:03b1aabeb6a633694aa8ee45e3a4fe26ba02208c682c9abb859b74ddaadec0d4
Download URL:

https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37766/dot_37766_DS1.pdf
File Type:

No Additional Files

More +

Evaluation of Stay-in-Place Metal Forms: Executive Summary Report

Details:

Supporting Files

You May Also Like