U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Best Practices for Construction and Repair of Bridge Approaches and Departures

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has experienced frequent distresses in bridge approach/departure asphalt pavements in its highway system. Commonly observed distresses include alligator cracking and rutting, which reduce roadway smoothness and safety. To minimize the pavement distress and improve ride quality, there is a need to determine

    the extent and root causes of the problem and to develop pavement rehabilitation strategies and guidelines. This research serves such purposes by carrying out three research tasks: (1) literature review and extent of the problem; (2) literature

    review and rehabilitation criteria; and (3) literature review and rehabilitation guidelines. This report summarizes the work and findings under all tasks. From the work under Task 1, it was found that in 2014-2015 on Florida Interstate highways, about 27% of bridges with asphalt pavements on their approaches/departures showed signs of cracking in their approach or departure asphalt pavements, and about 20% of the bridges have noticeable rutting in their approach or departure asphalt pavements. Bridges showing distresses in approach/departure asphalt pavements are mainly on I-75 and I-95. A variety of factors may cause excessive distresses in bridge approach/departure asphalt pavements, among which, inadequate asphalt layer thickness is one potential cause. The common maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) techniques used by various states for bridge approach/departure asphalt pavements include crack sealing, patching, milling and overlay, and reconstruction. Most states do not have special M&R strategies and guidelines. From the work under Task 2, tentative criteria for rehabilitation of bridge approach/department pavements were recommended. From the work under Task 3, a step-by-step procedure was proposed for identifying and comparing feasible rehabilitation strategies for bridge approach/departure asphalt pavements. The recommended rehabilitation strategy selection procedure includes: (1) pavement condition survey and evaluation; (2) identification of pavement distress causes; (3) selection of rehabilitation techniques; (4) formation of

    rehabilitation strategies; (5) life-cycle cost analysis; and (6) selection of rehabilitation strategy.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:beb4239457a33cd79367530023d2e8683be3e45a6b5bfd2c1d4722a054e4129b555d648f4dc0432fd9aff7f82c091ab805820171f29d60f0c9509c8ed565c185
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 4.50 MB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.