Alternative Fuel Vehicle Forecasts : Final report.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Forecasts : Final report.

Filetype[PDF-1.91 MB]


English
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
    Texas A&M Transportation Institute
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    PRC 14-28F
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
    United States
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Texas A&M Transportation Institute
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-Economic Impacts;NTL-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT-Alternative Fuels;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION;NTL-LAWS AND REGULATIONS-State Laws and Regulations;
  • Abstract:
    Federal and state fuel taxes account for the largest share of the Texas State Highway Fund at 48 percent and 29 percent, respectively, in Fiscal Year 2015. These taxes are levied on a per-gallon basis, meaning that as vehicles get more fuel efficient, they return less and less revenue for every mile driven. This is problematic from a funding standpoint because passenger and commercial vehicles are expected to continue increasing in terms of their fuel efficiency. Furthermore, vehicles that operate on alternative fuels are becoming increasingly popular. The two most popular alternative fuels, ethanol and compressed natural gas (CNG), are both taxed by the state at per-gallon rates similar to gasoline and diesel taxes. However, ethanol and CNG vehicles tend to be more fuel efficient than their petroleum fuel-based counterparts. Furthermore, vehicles that operate on fuels that are not taxed for transportation-related purposes, such as electric vehicles (EVs), are being produced and sold at an increasing pace. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs), for example, essentially operate for free on Texas roadways after their sales, registration, and inspection fees have been paid. If BEVs and other alternatively fueled vehicles (vehicles not operating on gasoline or diesel) see widespread adoption by the motoring public in Texas, then revenues going to the State Highway Fund could be reduced in the long term. It is therefore important for Texas to be aware of trends in the alternative fuel vehicle (AFV) industry and their potential impact on fuel consumption and associated fuel tax revenue generation. Awareness will allow state policies to address any potential funding issues in the foreseeable future. This report provides a summary of recent trends in the development of alternative fuel technologies and factors impacting their adoption by the passenger vehicle and commercial vehicle fleets. Researchers relied on government, academic, and private-sector resources in compiling this report. This report also discusses the potential revenue impacts to the State of Texas with a specific focus on how alternative fuel technology adoption could affect long-term state fuel tax revenues. Finally, this report includes summary information and discussion on federal, state, and local incentives aimed at encouraging alternative vehicle technology development, deployment, and adoption.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov