Alternative contracting research : [project summary].

Details

• Creators:
  Minchin, Edward
• Corporate Creators:
  Florida. Dept. of Transportation. Research Center
• Contributors:
  Autry, Alan
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  Alternatives Analysis Construction Projects Contracting Costs Design Bid Build Evaluation Literature Reviews Performance Measurement Surveys Time Duration
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  United States ; Florida
• Corporate Publisher:
  Florida. Dept. of Transportation. Research Center
• Abstract:
  To conserve taxpayer money, many governmental agencies use a low-bid process for design
  
  and construction services. The Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT) Design-Bid-Build
  
  process falls in this category. However, a low-bid approach does not guarantee that a project
  
  will meet expectations of cost, quality, and on-time delivery. FDOT has found that alternative
  
  contracting approaches, including A+B, Design Build, Incentive/Disincentive, No Excuse Bonus,
  
  and Lump Sum contracting, have shown benefits such as decreased project schedule, increased
  
  job quality, and improved on-time delivery. University of Florida researchers evaluated the
  
  effectiveness of alternative contracting methods
  
  and compared them to Design-Bid-Build.
  
  
• Format:
  PDF
• Alternate URL:
  http://www.dot.state.fl.us/research-center/Completed_Proj/Summary_CN/FDOT-BDV31-977-40-sum.pdf
• Funding:
  BDV31-977-40
• Collection(s):
  US Transportation Collection
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha256:4431e83f5fde7d5a3db33348643e10db3b093b35f6857cb21b3e4b614877fa72
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31298/dot_31298_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 86.81 KB ]