Load rating and FRP retrofitting of bridge abutment timber piles.
-
2016-05-01
Details:
-
Alternative Title:Load rating and FRP retrofitting of bridge abutment timber piles : a report of the findings of ICT project R27-134, strengthening of bridge wood piling retrofits for moment resistance, phase II.
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Phase II Final Report
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This report details Phase II of the study titled Strengthening of Bridge Wood Piling Retrofits for Moment Resistance. Phase I of the research (project
R27-082) was focused on developing a load rating method for timber piles under eccentric load and examining FRP retrofitting of pier piles.
However, Phase II focused first on numerically assessing the state of the practice of timber pile retrofitting in Illinois. The study next focused on
investigating load rating and FRP retrofitting of abutment timber piles as well as studying the long-term performance of FRP-wrapped timber piles.
Historically, timber piles have been designed for axial loads only. Under this assumption, conventional load rating procedures considered only the
effect of dead and live loads in determining the capacity of a timber pile. Unlike pier timber piles, abutment piles must resist significant lateral
forces from earth pressure and surcharge loads in addition to dead and live loads. Currently, there does not exist a separate load rating procedure
for abutment timber piles. In this study, a load rating method was developed specifically for abutment timber piles. The combined loading effects
were accounted for by using the allowable stress P–M interaction equation in the National Design Specification for Wood Construction (NDS). In
addition, a method was developed to account for the effect of FRP retrofits in the load rating. The results showed that deterioration levels as low as
10% could lead to unsatisfactory load ratings for abutment timber piles depending on the backfill soil type and equivalent fluid pressure assumed.
FRP retrofitting, however, increased the load rating of deteriorated abutment timber piles by at least 17%. FRP retrofitting techniques for abutment
piles were also examined experimentally. Three full-size timber pile specimens with different levels of deterioration were tested. A nondestructive
stress wave timing method was used to assess the condition of each specimen. FRP retrofits were designed for two of the specimens based on the
results of the condition assessment. The piles were load tested in the axial direction. First, a specified eccentric load was applied to induce a
bending moment, then a concentric axial load was applied until the proportional limit. Each pile was tested under a series of eccentric loads varying
from 10 kips to 35 kips. Timber condition normalized test results showed that the FRP retrofit was able to at least restore the properties of the piles
to their undeteriorated condition properties. Finally, the long-term performance of FRP-wrapped timber piles was studied by examining their
performance in uniaxial compression after exposure to long-term degradation. Field-extracted red oak pile specimens with different degrees of
initial deterioration were used in the study. The initial condition of the timber was assessed through stress wave timing. To simulate natural
degradation in unretrofitted and retrofitted timber piles caused by environmental exposure in a short period of time, an accelerated aging
procedure was used. The number of FRP layers and type of resin used (polyester, standard epoxy, and moisture-tolerant epoxy) were varied.
Results showed that accelerated aging induces significant deterioration in unretrofitted timber piles but the effects are relatively minor in the FRP-wrapped
specimens. It was also proven that FRP composite can significantly improve the performance of timber piles in terms of peak stress and
ductility, even after being subjected to extreme degradation.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type: