Welcome to ROSA P |
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Cost-effective treatment of existing guardrail systems.
  • Published Date:
  • Language:
Filetype[PDF-26.57 MB]

This document cannot be previewed automatically as it exceeds 5 MB
Please click the thumbnail image to view the document.
Cost-effective treatment of existing guardrail systems.
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • NTL Classification:
  • Abstract:
    A cost-effective means for upgrading existing guardrail systems with deviations from current practice (i.e., low-rail heights, antiquated end

    treatments, and improper installation) does not exist. As a result these systems remain on U.S. highways. Guardrail systems with deviations from current

    practice may not perform as intended, thus potentially resulting in fatalities and serious injuries from impacts with these safety devices. It is not plausible

    to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries from all guardrail system impacts. However, these risks could be reduced with the proper design, testing,

    installation, and maintenance of guardrail systems.

    This report offers recommendations for upgrading W-beam guardrail systems based on a benefit-to-cost analysis using the Roadside Safety

    Analysis Program (RSAP). This analysis was developed to simulate the most frequent and possible scenarios of existing W-beam guardrail systems with

    deviations from current practice. Before the analysis could be run, the field conditions and common deviations from current practice were reviewed and

    documented during a field investigation.

    This field investigation was conducted on rural arterial highways in the state of Kansas to determine the nature of existing guardrail systems

    with deviations from current practice. The most prominent barrier was the strong-post, W-beam guardrail. Deviations of the existing W-beam were low

    top-rail mounting-height, antiquated end treatments (i.e. turned-down and blunt-end terminals), rail damage, damaged and missing posts and blockouts,

    and insufficient length of need. The W-beam guardrail with low rail heights and turned-down and blunt-end terminals were the focus of the RSAP analysis.

    The varying guardrail system heights were modeled in RSAP by changing the level of containment of the W-beam guardrail system, and the

    antiquated end treatments were predefined features. The roadway and roadside features including obstacles (culverts and slopes) were modeled after those

    found in the field investigation. Finally, cost-effective safety treatments were recommended for existing W-beam guardrail system with low rail height and

    turned-down or blunt-end terminals which shielded culverts and slopes.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like: