Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

SMART operational field test evaluation : public support for bus transit in tri-county area of southeastern Michigan : final report

Filetype[PDF-331.81 KB]


  • English
    • Details You May Also Like

    Details:

    • Creators:
    • Corporate Creators:
      University of Michigan
    • Subject/TRT Terms:
    • Resource Type:
      Tech Report
    • Geographical Coverage:
      Michigan
    • Corporate Publisher:
      University of Michigan
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION-Paratransit;NTL-PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION-Advanced Public Transit Systems;NTL-INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS-Transit Management;
    • Abstract:
      Despite ever-decreasing public transit rider-ship in the U.S., public transit continues to enjoy moderate to high amounts of public support, meaning that the public continues to support public expenditures on transit. Indeed, since the 1970s some transit agencies have succeeded in passing dedicated tax millages in support oftransit service. In the spring of 1995, the Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART), which provides public transit in the greater Detroit region, became one such agency. Why voters, most of whom do not use public transit, continue to offer political support for transit remains an open question. On November 5, 1996, the authors conducted an exit poll of voters in the SMART region to assess overall levels of support for the SMART millage renewal and to test several hypotheses regarding why voters continue to support public transit. In this study, four alternative hypotheses are tested. These include: (1) voters support transit because they use it, (2) voters support transit so that others will use it and thereby reduce traffic congestion, (3) voters support transit because they view transit as a needed social service, and (4) voters offer greater support for transit as the quality of the service increases. To examine the accuracy of each hypothesis, numerous predictions that derive from each hypothesis were tested using statistical models (logistic regression) built from the voter survey data and census data.
    • Format:
      PDF
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • Download URL:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26