The geographic distribution of HMOF and TTF revenues and allocations in Virginia from FY 88 through FY 92.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

The geographic distribution of HMOF and TTF revenues and allocations in Virginia from FY 88 through FY 92.

Filetype[PDF-3.93 MB]


English
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
    Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    VTRC 93-TAR5
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
    Virginia
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
  • Abstract:
    This paper describes the current structure of transportation finance in the Commonwealth. The financial structure is made up of estimated revenues and recommended allocations. We present comparisons of the shares of state and federal transportation revenues and allocations for each of the nine VDOT construction districts. The analysis includes all state and federal funds that flow through both the Highway Maintenance and Operating Fund (HMOF) and the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF). We present the estimates in three parts. In the first section, we examine the geographic distribution of transportation allocations for each of VDOT's four primary activities: construction, maintenance, nonhighway modes (mass transit, ports, and airports), and administration and overhead as well as for the aggregate transportation program. In the second section, we estimate the geographic distribution of transportation revenues for the four primary activities listed above and the aggregate program. Finally, for the same activities and the aggregate, we present the ratio of the share of total allocations to the share of total revenues for each construction district.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov