The geographic distribution of HMOF and TTF revenues and allocations in Virginia : FY 93 update.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

The geographic distribution of HMOF and TTF revenues and allocations in Virginia : FY 93 update.

Filetype[PDF-1.24 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report.
    • Abstract:
      This report is an update of the report, The Geographic Distribution of HMOF and TTF Revenues and Allocations in Virginia From FY 88 through FY 92. As such, it describes the current structure of transportation finance in the Commonwealth. The financial structure is made up of estimated revenues and recommended allocations. Comparisons of the shares of state and federal transportation revenues and allocations for each of the nine VDOT construction districts are presented for a six-year period from FY 88 through FY 93. The analysis includes all state and federal funds that flow through both the Highway Maintenance and Operating Fund (HMOF) and the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF). We present the estimates in three sections. In the first section, we examine the geographic distribution of transportation allocations for each of VDOT's four primary activities: construction, maintenance, non highway modes (mass transit, ports, and airports), and administration and overhead and for the aggregate transportation program. In the second section, we estimate the geographic distribution of transportation revenues for the four primary activities listed above and for the aggregate program. Finally, for the same activities and for the aggregate, we present the ratio of the share of total allocations to the share of total revenues for each construction district.
    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26