The geographic distribution of HMOF and TTF revenues and allocations in Virginia : FY 93 update.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

The geographic distribution of HMOF and TTF revenues and allocations in Virginia : FY 93 update.

Filetype[PDF-1.24 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final report.
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    This report is an update of the report, The Geographic Distribution of HMOF and TTF Revenues and Allocations in Virginia From FY 88 through FY 92. As such, it describes the current structure of transportation finance in the Commonwealth. The financial structure is made up of estimated revenues and recommended allocations. Comparisons of the shares of state and federal transportation revenues and allocations for each of the nine VDOT construction districts are presented for a six-year period from FY 88 through FY 93. The analysis includes all state and federal funds that flow through both the Highway Maintenance and Operating Fund (HMOF) and the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF). We present the estimates in three sections. In the first section, we examine the geographic distribution of transportation allocations for each of VDOT's four primary activities: construction, maintenance, non highway modes (mass transit, ports, and airports), and administration and overhead and for the aggregate transportation program. In the second section, we estimate the geographic distribution of transportation revenues for the four primary activities listed above and for the aggregate program. Finally, for the same activities and for the aggregate, we present the ratio of the share of total allocations to the share of total revenues for each construction district.
  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov