Effect of Michigan multi-axle trucks on pavement distress and profile: volume 3.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Effect of Michigan multi-axle trucks on pavement distress and profile: volume 3.

Filetype[PDF-3.67 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Volume 3, Rigid pavements
    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • OCLC Number:
      676690603
    • Edition:
      Final report.
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Pavement Management and Performance ; NTL-FREIGHT-Trucking Industry ;
    • Abstract:
      With the adoption of the new mechanistic-empirical pavement design method and the employment of axle load

      spectra, the question of evaluating the pavement damage resulting from different axle and truck configurations has

      become more relevant. In particular, the state of Michigan is unique in permitting several heavy truck axle

      configurations that are composed of up to 11 axles, sometimes with as many as 8 axles within one axle group. Thus,

      there is a need to identify the relative pavement damage resulting from these multiple axle trucks.

      The study looked at both flexible and rigid pavement systems, and comprised of three main components: (1) inservice

      pavement performance data; (2) laboratory testing under multiple axles, and (3) mechanistic-empirical

      analyses. The results from in-service pavement performance data indicated that multiple axle groups appear to cause

      less damage in fatigue per load carried for both pavement types, whereas they cause more damage in rutting of

      flexible pavements and roughness for rigid pavements. Laboratory testing of asphalt concrete confirmed that

      multiple axles cause less fatigue damage per load carried, and that rutting is nearly proportional to the number of

      axles within an axle group. Results from flexural concrete beam fatigue testing showed significant variability;

      multiple linear regression analysis (independent variables: stress ratio, stress impulse and initial modulus of

      elasticity) indicated, on average, similar findings to asphalt concrete fatigue for a given stress ratio; however,

      mechanistic analysis showed that multiple axles cause considerable stress reduction leading to significantly lower

      fatigue damage. The mechanistic analysis also showed that multiple axles cause more faulting in rigid pavements.

      Mechanistic analyses of flexible pavements confirmed that multiple axles cause less fatigue damage per load

      carried, and rutting damage that is nearly proportional to the number of axles within an axle group. However, the

      mechanistic-empirical results suggest that the AASHTO Load Equivalency Factors (LEF) for large axle groups may

      be unconservative. Finally, Full scale slab testing to study joint/crack deterioration in plain concrete pavements was

      inconclusive.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.21