Welcome to ROSA P | Materials risk analysis. - 17748 | US Transportation Collection
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Materials risk analysis.
  • Published Date:
    2010-02-01
  • Language:
    English
Filetype[PDF-763.46 KB]


Details:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    WA-RD 745.1
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • OCLC Number:
    682948753
  • Edition:
    Final report.
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION ; NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Highway Safety ;
  • Format:
  • Abstract:
    State highway authorities routinely examine the quality of the materials used to build highway construction projects. Some

    materials are tested, some are accepted through a manufacturer’s certification of quality or compliance, some are physically

    inspected during fabrication and yet other materials are accepted through visual inspection. Unanswered is why some

    materials are more closely examined through physical testing and other materials receive much less scrutiny.

    This paper describes a materials risk analysis process and the conclusions from that risk analysis conducted at the

    Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Typical construction materials are examined for two critical

    risks: the risk of having a material fail to meet specification and the consequences of that material failing to meet

    specification. Subject matter experts (materials, construction, structures, maintenance, traffic, etc.) within the WSDOT rated

    these risks through a Delphi process. Results of the risk analysis classify materials into four appropriate categories for either

    more or less intensive examination by the state highway authority: highest risk materials undergo physical acceptance

    testing or are inspected during fabrication under a manufacturer’s quality system plan; moderate risk materials are accepted

    through the manufacturer’s certification of compliance (often combined with a quality systems plan or visual inspection);

    lower risk materials are accepted with a manufacturer’s certification or with a catalog cut; and the lowest risk materials are

    accepted through visual inspection in the field. Future materials risk analyses may be performed on periodic intervals (five

    to ten years suggested) to re-examine the risks and rankings by subject matter experts.

  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like:
Submit Feedback >