Long term striping alternatives for bridge decks : final report, January 2009.

Details

• Creators:
  Abbas, Ala R. ; Mohi, Amal ; Butterfield, Justin
• Corporate Creators:
  University of Akron. Department of Civil Engineering
• Corporate Contributors:
  Ohio. Dept. of Transportation. Office of Research and Development
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Road marking materials
  • Bridge decks
  • Concrete bridges
  • Road markings--Ohio--Testing
  • Concrete bridges--Floors
• Publication/ Report Number:
  FHWA/OH-2008/13
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  Ohio
• Edition:
  Final report.
• Corporate Publisher:
  Ohio. Dept. of Transportation
• Abstract:
  This study evaluated the performance of the following pavement marking materials on Portland cement concrete bridge decks: Waterborne traffic paint: Ennis fast dry waterborne traffic paint; Thermoplastic: Swarcotherm alkyd; Preformed thermoplastic: Premark Plus and Premark Contrast; Slow cure epoxy: IPS HPS-2, PolyCarb Mark 55.2, and Epoplex LS 60; Fast cure epoxy: PolyCarb Mark 55.4 and Epoplex LS 70; Polyurea: IPS HPS-5, PolyCarb Mark 75, and Epoplex Glomarc 90; Modified urethane: IPS HPS-4; Methyl methacrylate: Ennis Duraset 1 and Duraset Pathfinder; High performance durable tapes: 3M 380WR ES, 3M 380WR-5 ES, and 3M 270 ES The main objectives were to compare the performance evaluation results of these materials to milestone performance criteria, augment these results with performance data from the National Transportation Product Evaluation Program (NTPEP), estimate the service life of the pavement markings, and compare these materials based on their life cycle costs.
• Format:
  PDF
• Funding:
  State Job No. 134315
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/17540/dot_17540_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 5.57 MB]
• Collection(s):
  US Transportation Collection
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha256:5c19cb56dc3a8a610df059f921fa0f8638b03b7d94c6a735f5968d01799d0918