Long term striping alternatives for bridge decks : executive summary report.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Long term striping alternatives for bridge decks : executive summary report.

Filetype[PDF-56.31 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Executive summary report.
    • Corporate Publisher:
    • Abstract:
      ODOT uses a number of pavement marking

      materials including waterborne and alkyd traffic paint,

      polyester, thermoplastic, preformed tapes, epoxy, and

      heat-fused preformed thermoplastic; which are

      addressed in ODOT Construction and Material

      Specifications (C&MS) Items 640 and 740. Material

      selection is presented in Table 397-1 of the 2002 Traffic

      Engineering Manual (TEM), whereby the material type

      is chosen according to the remaining life of the

      pavement surface, type of line (longitudinal line or

      auxiliary), type of pavement surface (asphalt or

      concrete), and average daily traffic (ADT). According to

      this table, durable markings such as thermoplastic and

      epoxy are more likely to be applied on highways with

      high traffic volumes and pavements with a remaining

      surface life in excess of four years, while non-durable

      markings such as traffic paint and polyester are

      recommended for restriping. Furthermore, thermoplastic

      markings are specified for new asphalt pavements and

      epoxy markings are specified for new concrete

      pavements. This constraint, however, has significant

      financial impacts on projects that include concrete

      bridge decks connected to mainline asphalt pavements.

      The additional cost in such projects is resulted from

      paying the contractor an extra cost to use thermoplastic

      for the asphalt portion and epoxy for the concrete

      portion, or from dividing the project into two separate

      projects; one for the asphalt and another for the concrete.

      Due to these financial concerns, thermoplastic,

      which has poor durability on concrete surfaces, is

      currently being applied onto the concrete bridge decks as

      well as the mainline asphalt pavements. This often

      results in premature debonding in the bridge stripes

      compared to those on the adjoining asphalt pavement.

      This deficiency raises major safety concerns

      regarding these bridges, and leads to low

      performance ratings as measured using various

      performance indicators in force by ODOT.

      As a result, ODOT invited the pavement

      marking industry to provide alternative marking

      materials and/or installation techniques to be

      tested on Portland cement concrete bridge decks

      along interstate I-71 in District 3; and initiated

      this project to evaluate the performance of the

      proposed materials.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26