Ullman, B. R., Trout, N. D., & Dudek, C. L. (2009). Use of Graphics and Symbols on Dynamic Message Signs: Technical Report (Report No. FHWA/TX-08/0-5256-1). Texas Transportation Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/16835
Ullman, Brooke R., Nada D. Trout, and Conrad L. Dudek. Use of Graphics and Symbols on Dynamic Message Signs: Technical Report. Report no. FHWA/TX-08/0-5256-1. Texas Transportation Institute, 2009. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/16835.
Ullman, Brooke R., et al. Use of Graphics and Symbols on Dynamic Message Signs: Technical Report. Texas Transportation Institute, 2009, Report no. FHWA/TX-08/0-5256-1, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/16835.
This project has taken a step toward defining how graphic and symbol displays can improve or assist communication with drivers. Through three human factors evaluations of alternative designs, researchers identified specific design elements that should or should not be used in graphic displays. Additionally, some of the key benefits identified for the use of graphic displays as compared to equivalent text messages are: (1) A graphic display appears to improve the ability of drivers to identify available lanes in a problem area. (2) The delivery of incident descriptor information (e.g. accidents or work zones) through the use of graphic symbols improves comprehension levels of non-native-language drivers (e.g., a driver whose primary language is Spanish). (3) The viewing time required for comprehension by a non-native speaker may be shortened as a result of the use of graphics and symbols. (4) The use of graphics makes it possible to effectively illustrate unusual operational scenarios, such as high-occupancy vehicle lanes or adjacent toll lanes, through graphic representation of roadway geometry, logos, shields, etc.
Ullman, B. R., Trout, N. D., & Dudek, C. L. (2009). Use of Graphics and Symbols on Dynamic Message Signs: Technical Report (Report No. FHWA/TX-08/0-5256-1). Texas Transportation Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/16835
Ullman, Brooke R., Nada D. Trout, and Conrad L. Dudek. Use of Graphics and Symbols on Dynamic Message Signs: Technical Report. Report no. FHWA/TX-08/0-5256-1. Texas Transportation Institute, 2009. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/16835.
Ullman, Brooke R., et al. Use of Graphics and Symbols on Dynamic Message Signs: Technical Report. Texas Transportation Institute, 2009, Report no. FHWA/TX-08/0-5256-1, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/16835.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.