The transportation and environmental impacts of infill versus greenfield development: a comparative case study analysis.
-
1999-10-01
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Contributors:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This paper tries to answer the question of which site provides more efficient or better transportation services to a new residential or commercial development - an urban infill site or a suburban edge/greenfield? In order to answer this question, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) modeled the impacts of the location of a given development (one suburban edge/greenfield and one infill) and compared the results from the model. This was undertaken in three areas of the country: Montgomery County, Maryland; West Palm Beach, Florida; and San Diego, California. Travel costs, transportation system performance, and transportation emissions were examined for each site. Across the board, results indicated that the urban infill site would perform better than the suburban edge/greenfield.
-
Format:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type: