Experimental Evaluation of Municipal Speed Enforcement Programs
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Experimental Evaluation of Municipal Speed Enforcement Programs

Filetype[PDF-16.79 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Creators:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report
    • Contracting Officer:
    • Abstract:
      Three California communities were selected to participate in the study on the basis of comparability and isolation from each other. Two of the communities' police departments implemented special speed enforcement programs focused on six zones within each community. The third community refrained from implementing any special traffic enforcement effort for the six-month duration of the programs, provided crash, speed, and crime data for six comparable control zones, and served as a comparison site in the quasi-experiment. Officers in both experimental communities spent, on average, more than 8 hours each week conducting radar and laser-assisted speed enforcement in each of the special enforcement zones. Project staff also organized traffic safety program support committees in the experimental communities. The committees planned and implemented extensive publicity programs to elevate public awareness of the special enforcement efforts. Crash, speed sample, and crime data were obtained from the participating police departments and a statewide reporting system. The primary dependent measure of program impact was the incidence of injury, fatal, and property damage only crashes in which unsafe speed, following-too-closely, or right-of-way violation was the primary collision factor. No significant differences in effectiveness between the two special enforcement programs were found. However, the experimental communities experienced declines in the numbers of speed-related crashes of 11.3% and 1.1%, while the same categories of crashes increased by 3.4% in the comparison community. A statistically significant reduction in speed-related crashes was found in one of the experimental communities. Times series analysis found no significant declines in all crashes, suggesting that program effects were confined to the primary collision factors associated with vehicle speed. Further, unobtrusive measures of vehicle speed found 19% and 10% declines in the numbers of vehicles exceeding the limits in the two experimental communities, while the numbers of speeders declined by only 3% in the comparison community. The incidence of Part I and Part II crimes in the special enforcement and control zones was analyzed for all three communities. Both experimental communities experienced statistically significant declines in the incidence of the only type of Part I crime that is equally likely to occur during daylight hours as at night (i.e., when the special enforcement was conducted). Paired samples analyses found the 11% and 12% declines in larceny/theft to be statistically significant, and attributable to the deterrence effects of the special enforcement programs; larceny/theft declined by only 1.7% statewide and increased by 4% in the control zones of the comparison community. Overall, the research showed that municipal speed enforcement programs can have significant, positive effects on measures of public opinion, traffic safety, and crime. /Abstract from report summary page/
    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26