Welcome to ROSA P | Public acceptability of highway safety countermeasures. Volume 3, Alcohol and drug research - 1287 | NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Research
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Public acceptability of highway safety countermeasures. Volume 3, Alcohol and drug research
  • Published Date:
    1981-06-01
  • Language:
    English
Filetype[PDF-12.87 MB]


This document cannot be previewed automatically as it exceeds 5 MB
Please click the thumbnail image to view the document.
Public acceptability of highway safety countermeasures. Volume 3, Alcohol and drug research
Details:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    DOT-HS-805-972 ; NTIS-PB82110438 ;
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • TRIS Online Accession Number:
    346123
  • Edition:
    Final report
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-SAFETY AND SECURITYNTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Highway Safety ; NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Human Factors ;
  • Format:
  • Abstract:
    Scanned by Ecompex on April 13 2007

    This volume, part of a larger study on public attitudes towards proposed highway safety countermeasures for alcohol and drugs, unsafe driving behaviors, and pedestrian safety, discusses reactions to breath testers, drunk-driving deterrence techniques, and roadside surveys. Although not a safety strategy, roadside surveys are necessary to obtain accurate measures of drivers' impairment conditions in order to develop appropriate highway safety programs. Safety strategy acceptability issues in the public survey are presented in relation to demographic characteristics, personal drinking habits, perceived countermeasure effectiveness, and perception of the drinking-driving problem; while likelihood of participation, personal safety, validity of information obtained, and logistical factors in data collection mark the criteria for evaluating roadside surveys. Legal and liability concerns, cost and implementation issues, potential effectiveness, and perceived public opposition exemplify dimensions used by special interest group members to evaluate countermeasure strategies. Perspectives on reactions to countermeasures in other program areas can he found in Volume II for Safe Driving Conformance Research and in Volume IV for Pedestrian Safety. Volume I of this report describes the research methodology, while Volume V (Surmary Report) concisely summarizes the principal results of each of the detailed countermeasure reports and provides guidelines for successful implementation of highway safety countermeasures. /Abstract from report summary page/

  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like:
Submit Feedback >