Minimum liability insurance levels and related requirements for motor carriers to demonstrate financial responsibility in case of damages from crashes were established in the 1980’s by Congressional legislation. These levels have not been changed since then. The question is whether these levels should be raised, weighing the benefits of improved co
...
Hymel, K., Lee, D. B., Pearlman, J., Pritchard, R., & Rainville, L. (2013). Financial Responsibility Requirements for Commercial Motor Vehicles (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-12-045). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Office of Analysis, Research, and Technology. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502975
Hymel, Kent, Douglass B. Lee, Jonathan Pearlman, Robert Pritchard, and Lydia Rainville. Financial Responsibility Requirements for Commercial Motor Vehicles. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-045. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Office of Analysis, Research, and Technology, 2013. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502975.
Hymel, Kent, et al. Financial Responsibility Requirements for Commercial Motor Vehicles. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Office of Analysis, Research, and Technology, 2013, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-045, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502975.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2012-12-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2012). Development and Assessment of a Driver Drowsiness Monitoring System (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-12-008). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502689
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Development and Assessment of a Driver Drowsiness Monitoring System. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-12-008. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502689.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Development and Assessment of a Driver Drowsiness Monitoring System. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-12-008, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502689.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2012-12-01
|
PDF
This paper examines the safety performance of passenger carrier drivers. Special emphasis is given to the motorcoach segment. A model that investigates the contribution of driver factors on the number of State-reportable crashes in which the driver was involved is presented for passenger carrier drivers. The findings suggest that the following fact
...
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2012). The Safety Performance of Passenger Carrier Drivers (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-12-002). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502832
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. The Safety Performance of Passenger Carrier Drivers. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-002. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502832.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division The Safety Performance of Passenger Carrier Drivers. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-002, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502832.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2012-12-01
|
PDF
The objective of this study was to determine if commercial motorcoach drivers work to the limits of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) hours-of-service (HOS) regulations. Data were collected on duty start times, total duty time per 24 hours, and total sleep time per 24 hours. Performance was measured and subjective fatigue and
...
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2012). Motorcoach Driver Fatigue Study 2011: Research Brief. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502730
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Motorcoach Driver Fatigue Study 2011: Research Brief. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502730.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Motorcoach Driver Fatigue Study 2011: Research Brief. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502730.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2012-12-01
|
PDF
The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences for safety and health of split sleep versus consolidated sleep by comparing the effects of consolidated nighttime sleep, split sleep, and consolidated daytime sleep on total sleep time, performance, subjective state, and biomedical measures that correlate with health outcomes over the lon
...
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2012). Investigation of the Effects of Split Sleep Schedules on Commercial Vehcle Driver Safety and Health (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-12-003). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502726
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Investigation of the Effects of Split Sleep Schedules on Commercial Vehcle Driver Safety and Health. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-12-003. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502726.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Investigation of the Effects of Split Sleep Schedules on Commercial Vehcle Driver Safety and Health. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-12-003, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502726.
More than 124,000 large trucks and buses were involved in crashes on America’s roadways in 2009, resulting in 3,619 deaths and 75,141 injuries. The effects of non-pathologic or acute fatigue can impair the ability of professional drivers, who drive long distances for hours at a time, to drive effectively and safely. Although fatigue has been well r
...
Calloway, M., Bieber-Tregear, M., Conner, D., Williams, J. R., Tiller, M., Amana, A., Casey, L., Wiegand, S., Dusablon, T., & Tregear, S. (2012). Fatigue and Motorcoach/Bus Driver Safety: Evidence Report. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/49033
Calloway, Meredith, Michelle Bieber-Tregear, Dana Conner, Jessica R. Williams, Marie Tiller, Arit Amana, Latasha Casey, Sandy Wiegand, Tracy Dusablon, and Stephen Tregear. Fatigue and Motorcoach/Bus Driver Safety: Evidence Report. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/49033.
Calloway, Meredith, et al. Fatigue and Motorcoach/Bus Driver Safety: Evidence Report. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/49033.
Eighty-four commercial motorcoach drivers participated in a month-long study of duty start time, total duty time, total sleep time per 24 hours, with sleepiness, fatigue, and performance measured as they were going on and off duty. Drivers worked their normal schedules of duty and rest for the average 31 days of participation. Drivers wore a wrist-
...
Belenky, G., Wu, L. J., Zaslona, J. L., & Hodges, J. (2012). Motorcoach Driver Fatigue Study 2011 (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-12-042). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503020
Belenky, Gregory, Lora J. Wu, Jennifer L Zaslona, and Jack Hodges. Motorcoach Driver Fatigue Study 2011. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-12-042. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503020.
Belenky, Gregory, et al. Motorcoach Driver Fatigue Study 2011. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-12-042, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503020.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2012-12-01
|
PDF
The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences for safety and health of split sleep versus consolidated sleep by comparing the effects of consolidated nighttime sleep, split sleep, and consolidated daytime sleep on total sleep time, performance, subjective state, and biomedical measures that correlate with health outcomes over the lon
...
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2012). Investigation of the Effects of Split Sleep Schedules on Commercial Vehicle Driver Safety and Health [Research Brief]. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502727
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Investigation of the Effects of Split Sleep Schedules on Commercial Vehicle Driver Safety and Health [Research Brief]. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502727.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Investigation of the Effects of Split Sleep Schedules on Commercial Vehicle Driver Safety and Health [Research Brief]. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502727.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2012-09-01
|
PDF
In FY 2007, Federal and State enforcement personnel conducted more than 15,000 CRs on individual motor carriers. It is intended that through education, heightened safety regulation awareness, and the enforcement effects of the CR, carriers will improve the safety of their commercial vehicle operations and, ultimately, reduce the number and severity
...
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2012). RRA-12-009 Compliance Review Effectiveness Model: FY 2007 (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-12-009). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502825
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. RRA-12-009 Compliance Review Effectiveness Model: FY 2007. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-009. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502825.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division RRA-12-009 Compliance Review Effectiveness Model: FY 2007. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-009, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502825.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2012-09-01
|
PDF
This annual edition of Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts contains descriptive statistics about fatal, injury, andproperty damage only crashes involving large trucks and buses in 2010. Selected crash statistics on passengervehicles are also presented for comparison purposes
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2012). Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2010 (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-12-023). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502815
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2010. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-023. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502815.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2010. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-023, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502815.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2012-09-01
|
PDF
In FY 2008, Federal and State enforcement personnel conducted 14,906 compliance reviews (CRs) on individual motor carriers. It is intended that through education, heightened safety regulation awareness, and the enforcement effects of the CR, carriers will improve the safety of their commercial vehicle operations and, ultimately, reduce the number a
...
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2012). RRA-12-010 Compliance Review Effectiveness Model: FY 2008 (Report No. MCSA-RRA-12-010). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502826
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. RRA-12-010 Compliance Review Effectiveness Model: FY 2008. Report no. MCSA-RRA-12-010. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502826.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division RRA-12-010 Compliance Review Effectiveness Model: FY 2008. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, Report no. MCSA-RRA-12-010, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502826.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
2012-07-11
|
PDF
Presentation to FMCSA Division Staff. The CVISN program provides a framework or “architecture” that enables government agencies, the motor carrier industry, and other parties engaged in CVO safety assurance and regulation to exchange and use information to improve safety, and to conduct business transactions electronically.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2012). Introduction to Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks (CVISN)[presentation]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/55789
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Introduction to Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks (CVISN)[presentation]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/55789.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Introduction to Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks (CVISN)[presentation]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/55789.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2012-07-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2012). Large Truck Crash Overview 2010 (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-12-023). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502820
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. Large Truck Crash Overview 2010. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-023. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502820.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division Large Truck Crash Overview 2010. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-12-023, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502820.
The purpose of this project was to identify the impacts of implementing speed limiters (SL) in commercial vehicle fleet operations. These impacts may be related to safety through a reduction in the number and/or severity of crashes, and/or address operational issues. This report is the second report of a two-phase approach. Phase I centered on a de
...
Hanowski, R. J., Bergoffen, G., Hickman, J. S., Guo, F., Murray, D., Bishop, R., Johnson, S., & Camden, M. (2012). Research on the Safety Impacts of Speed Limiter Device Installations on Commercial Motor Vehicles: Phase II (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-12-006). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502748
Hanowski, Richard J, Gene Bergoffen, Jeffrey S. Hickman, Feng Guo, Dan Murray, Richard Bishop, Steve Johnson, and Matthew Camden. Research on the Safety Impacts of Speed Limiter Device Installations on Commercial Motor Vehicles: Phase II. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-12-006. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502748.
Hanowski, Richard J, et al. Research on the Safety Impacts of Speed Limiter Device Installations on Commercial Motor Vehicles: Phase II. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2012, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-12-006, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502748.
Driving is a complicated psychomotor performance that depends on fine coordination between the sensory and motor systems. Many health conditions exist which have the potential to impair perception, cognition (including alertness, attitude to risk, and recall) and/or motor function and, as a result, can make driving less safe. Obstructive sleep apne
...
Williams, J. R., Amana, A., & Tregear, S. J. (2011). Evidence Report: Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Safety: Updated Review [11/30/2011]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502949
Williams, Jessica R., Arit Amana, and Stephen J. Tregear. Evidence Report: Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Safety: Updated Review [11/30/2011]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502949.
Williams, Jessica R., et al. Evidence Report: Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Safety: Updated Review [11/30/2011]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502949.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2011-10-01
|
PDF
This annual edition of Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts contains descriptive statistics about fatal, injury, andproperty damage only crashes involving large trucks and buses in 2009. Selected crash statistics on passengervehicles are also presented for comparison purposes
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2011). Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2009 (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-11-025). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502814
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2009. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-11-025. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502814.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2009. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-11-025, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502814.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2011-10-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2011). Large Truck Crash Overview 2009 (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-11-024). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502796
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. Large Truck Crash Overview 2009. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-11-024. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502796.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division Large Truck Crash Overview 2009. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-11-024, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502796.
The Vehicle Safety Communications – Applications (VSC-A) Project was a three-year project (December 2006 - December 2009) to develop and test communications-based vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) safety systems to determine if Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) at 5.9 GHz, in combination with vehicle positioning, can improve upon autonomous vehicl
...
Ahmed-Zaid, F., Bai, F., Bai, S., Basnayake, C., Bellur, B., Brovold, S., Brown, G., Caminiti, L., Cunningham, D., Elzein, H., Hong, K. P., Ivan, J., Jiang, D., Kenney, J. W., Krishnan, H., Lovell, J., Maile, M., Masselink, D., McGlohon, E., ... VanSickle, S. (2011). Vehicle Safety Communications – Applications (VSC-A) Final Report (Report No. DOT HS 811 492A). United States. Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/43933
Ahmed-Zaid, F., F Bai, S Bai, C Basnayake, B Bellur, S Brovold, and G Brown, et al.. Vehicle Safety Communications – Applications (VSC-A) Final Report. Report no. DOT HS 811 492A. United States. Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2011. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/43933.
Ahmed-Zaid, F., et al. Vehicle Safety Communications – Applications (VSC-A) Final Report. United States. Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2011, Report no. DOT HS 811 492A, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/43933.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2011-08-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2011). Evaluation of the CSA 2010 Operational Model Test: Summary of Findings (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-11-019). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502810
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. Evaluation of the CSA 2010 Operational Model Test: Summary of Findings. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-11-019. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502810.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division Evaluation of the CSA 2010 Operational Model Test: Summary of Findings. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-11-019, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502810.
In accordance with its primary mission to reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities involving large trucks and buses, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) initiated the Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 (CSA 2010) Operational Model Test. The program focused on initiating contact with more carriers and drivers, development of a ne
...
Evaluation of the CSA 2010 Operational Model Test: Full Report (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-11-019). (2011). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503016
Evaluation of the CSA 2010 Operational Model Test: Full Report. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-11-019. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503016.
Evaluation of the CSA 2010 Operational Model Test: Full Report. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2011, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-11-019, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503016.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.