A Sensitivity Analysis Comparing Two Procedures for Adjusting As-Measured Spectra to Reference Conditions : SAE ARP 866A vs. ISO 9613-1/ANSI S1.26-1995.
Reherman, C. N., Roof, C. J., & Fleming, G. G. (2002). A Sensitivity Analysis Comparing Two Procedures for Adjusting As-Measured Spectra to Reference Conditions : SAE ARP 866A vs. ISO 9613-1/ANSI S1.26-1995. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9515
Reherman, Clay N, Christopher J. Roof, and Gregg G. Fleming. A Sensitivity Analysis Comparing Two Procedures for Adjusting As-Measured Spectra to Reference Conditions : SAE ARP 866A vs. ISO 9613-1/ANSI S1.26-1995. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.), 2002. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9515.
Reherman, Clay N, et al. A Sensitivity Analysis Comparing Two Procedures for Adjusting As-Measured Spectra to Reference Conditions : SAE ARP 866A vs. ISO 9613-1/ANSI S1.26-1995. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.), 2002, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9515.
Two procedures for adjusting as-measured test-day spectra to reference day conditions –
;
the Society of Automotive Engineers’ (SAE) Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP)
;
No. 866A (866A) and a procedure utilizing pure-tone absorption equations, developed in
;
support of the International Organization for Standardization’s (ISO) 9613-1 and the
;
American National Standards Institute’s (ANSI) S1.26-1995, and refined for application
;
to one-third octave-band data – were evaluated and compared. The ISO and ANSI puretone
;
absorption equations are identical to each other. The 866A procedure historically
;
has been used for atmospheric absorption corrections for Federal Aviation Regulations
;
(FAR) Part 36, Noise Standards: Aircraft Type and Airworthiness Certification and
;
similar regulations of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The
;
ISO/ANSI procedure analyzed herein is under consideration for inclusion into
;
harmonized regulations. This document presents a comparison of data corrected to
;
several distances using the two different methodologies.
Reherman, C. N., Roof, C. J., & Fleming, G. G. (2002). A Sensitivity Analysis Comparing Two Procedures for Adjusting As-Measured Spectra to Reference Conditions : SAE ARP 866A vs. ISO 9613-1/ANSI S1.26-1995. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9515
Reherman, Clay N, Christopher J. Roof, and Gregg G. Fleming. A Sensitivity Analysis Comparing Two Procedures for Adjusting As-Measured Spectra to Reference Conditions : SAE ARP 866A vs. ISO 9613-1/ANSI S1.26-1995. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.), 2002. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9515.
Reherman, Clay N, et al. A Sensitivity Analysis Comparing Two Procedures for Adjusting As-Measured Spectra to Reference Conditions : SAE ARP 866A vs. ISO 9613-1/ANSI S1.26-1995. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.), 2002, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9515.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.