Safety Evaluation of Sinusoidal Centerline Rumble Strips

Details

• Creators:
  Donnell, Eric T. ; Gayah, Vikash V. ; Poudel, Prakash ; Ahmad, Numan
• Corporate Creators:
  Pennsylvania State University. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
• Contributors:
  Hawley, Emily ; Priebe, Gabe B. ; Burke, Patricia
• Corporate Contributors:
  Montana Department of Transportation ; United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  Bayes' Theorem Before And After Studies Center Lines Crash Modification Factors Empirical Methods Rumble Strips Statistical Inference Two Lane Highways
• Publication/ Report Number:
  FHWA/MT-26-003/09932-820
• DOI:
  https://doi.org/10.21949/1529575
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  United States ; Montana
• Edition:
  Final Report (January 2022 through July 2026)
• Corporate Publisher:
  Montana. Department of Transportation
• Abstract:
  The Montana Department of Transportation installed nearly 600 miles of sinusoidal centerline rumble strips (SCLRS) in 2021.These were mostly installed on high-speed, two-lane rural highways, in the Kalispell Division and Missoula area. The sinusoidal pattern produces lower exterior noise levels than conventional centerline rumble strips, but the safety effects of the pattern have not been quantified. This study performed an observational before-after analysis of the SCLRS installation on two-lane rural highways using the Empirical Bayes (EB) methodology. Crash modification factors (CMFs) for a variety of crash types were less than 1.0, indicating that SCLRS were associated with a reduction in crash frequency. The CMF associated with total target crashes—defined as opposite direction collisions—was 0.711 while the CMF associated with fatal plus injury target crashes was 0.624.The only CMF that exceeded 1.0 was for the single-vehicle run-off-the-road crash type; however, this result was not statistically significant. This study also compared the safety performance of the SCLRS to that of conventional centerline rumble strips in Montana. Because the installation dates of the conventional pattern were unknown, a causal inference framework was used for evaluation. The results indicate that the CMFs for the conventional and sinusoidal patterns have confidence intervals that overlap, suggesting similar safety performance associated with the two patterns. An economic evaluation found that both centerline rumble strips patterns have a benefit-cost ratio exceeding 1.0.
• Format:
  PDF
• Funding:
  9932-820
• Collection(s):
  US Transportation Collection
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:cf8743f813c921ff8089841c6b2cefa8b54c98ff38d82ee903a8ff5dc0f26c688c01105b42f4de459343c2595af5aa4d106db629570cf208ff0587f4727cb2ea
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92622/dot_92622_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 4.06 MB ]