U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Simplified Shear Design of Prestressed Concrete Members

File Language:
English


Select the Download button to view the document
Please click the download button to view the document.

Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
    Purdue University. Joint Transportation Research Program
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    FHWA/IN/JTRP-2003/5
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final Report
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Indiana Department of Transportation
  • Abstract:
    Design methods for the shear resistance of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams are based on empirical evidence. Due to different approaches in their development different equations are used to calculate the shear strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete. Recent research conducted by Tureyen has proposed a simplified shear model for reinforced concrete which is primarily based upon mechanics and corresponds well with a wide range of test results. The objective of this research was to determine the applicability of the shear model to prestressed concrete. The applicability of the shear model was evaluated by a comparison of its results with the results of a database of 84 specimens which failed in shear. This analysis indicated that the shear model is applicable to prestressed sections. The shear model was simplified to develop an equation which is suitable for design office use. This equation is consistent with that proposed by Tureyen for reinforced concrete and unifies the design of these sections. As most prestressed sections designed are either T or I in shape, the research also investigates the use of the simplified design equation for these sections. Based on a comparison with test results, it is shown that the simplified design equation works well and provides a consistent factor of safety. A design example is presented to illustrate the differences between the proposed design equation and the current ACI 318 and AASHTO 16th Edition provisions. Differences resulting from the different design methods are highlighted and discussed. As the proposed design equation requires calculation of the neutral axis depth, a simple hand-calculation procedure is also developed to approximate this value for prestressed sections. Finally, recommendations are provided for the proper implementation of the proposed method in design practice.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Funding:
    SPR-2798
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:57286d531be4c7192d5cf14e95afb618988f1a16caa8b69010f594e020d159a55621162188fa8676e3a4be6de037773a7c5f3b0d443466707d4ae092682f76f9
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 10.33 MB ]
PREVIOUS
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
Details
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
BACK TO TOP