Corporate culture, compliance and railroad operating rules
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Corporate culture, compliance and railroad operating rules

Filetype[PDF-2.02 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Edition:
    Final Report May 1997
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    A focus group was held at the 1996 Bi-annual Operating Rules Association meeting of North American railroads to discuss the

    general issue of compliance and operating rules. Twelve operating rules officers participated, representing Class I, II, and III

    railroads. Individual structured interviews were also conducted both prior to and following the focus group session to discuss

    general issues surrounding operating rules, and to provide follow-up information to major findings from the focus group session.

    Focus group participants generally reported that senior management tends to emphasize productivity over safety, suggesting

    some railroads may have created an organizationalculture that unintentionally encourages operating rules violations. Follow-up

    interviews with a number of industry representatives supported this view. Some interviewees suggested railroad mergers often

    result in discordant management philosophies withinthe same organization, directly influencing corporate culture and how

    operating rules officersenforce rules compliance. Findings for each of the five focus group questions are categorized by type of

    response. Specific recommendations for structural change and follow-on work are also discussed.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov