Effectiveness of Geosynthetics in Soil/Aggregate Stabilization—Evaluation Using Bender Element Sensor Technology
-
2025-06-01
-
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
DOI:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final Report 10/1/21–6/30/25
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This report presents laboratory evaluations of the effectiveness of geosynthetics in stabilizing unbound aggregate layers and develops design guidelines for using geosynthetic-stabilized pavements in Illinois. The research focused on quantifying benefits from geosynthetic mechanical stabilization and incorporating those benefits into pavement analysis and design procedures. An experimental program was conducted, including laboratory triaxial testing and large-scale test bed evaluations. Twelve geosynthetic products, including ten geogrids (integral or punched and drawn, welded, and woven) and two geotextiles (woven and nonwoven), were tested. Six common aggregate materials were evaluated, including dense-graded aggregates (e.g., IDOT CA 6, CA 6/10, partially crushed gravel, recycled concrete aggregate) and open-graded aggregates (AASHTO No. 57, IDOT RR 01) with selected geosynthetics. Bender element sensor technology was used to quantify modulus enhancement due to geosynthetic inclusion through increased shear wave velocity measurements. The study found that geosynthetics can enhance the modulus of aggregate layers, and both integral and welded geogrids generally outperformed woven geogrids and geotextiles. Proper matching between geogrid aperture size and aggregate particle size was essential for achieving effective interlocking in open-graded materials. The zone of influence for geogrids to form a mechanically stabilized layer was typically about 4 in. The results were integrated into finite element analysis (FEA) models to simulate pavement layered structures and solve for the response behavior. The vertical deviator stress computed on a subgrade using FEA was typically reduced when a geosynthetic was present at the base-subgrade layer interface, indicating a response benefit. Design guidelines were developed to recommend reduced aggregate base thicknesses when geosynthetics are used. These guidelines are intended to update IDOT’s Subgrade Stability Manual and the Bureau of Local Roads and Streets Manual for Class IV low-volume roads. This study provided ready-to-use recommendations for geosynthetic selection and its benefits based on the laboratory quantification of modulus enhancement used in the mechanistic pavement analysis.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type: