U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Safety Effectiveness of Highway Design Features— Volume III: Cross Sections

File Language:
English


Select the Download button to view the document
Please click the download button to view the document.

Details

  • Corporate Creators:
    United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    FHWA-RD-91-046
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Right Statement:
    Public Domain
  • Geographical Coverage:
    United States
  • Corporate Publisher:
    United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration
  • Abstract:
    Past studies have revealed that of more than 50 roadway-related features which can significantly affect crash experience, cross sectional elements are among the most important. Such elements include lane width, shoulder width, shoulder type, roadside features (e.g., sideslope, clear zone, placement and types of roadside obstacles), bridge width, and median width, among others. In addition to these elements, multilane design alternatives may also be considered where basic two-lane roads are not adequate. Such alternatives include the addition of through lanes, passing lanes, various median designs (e.g., raised medians), left-turn lanes (two-way, alternating), and others. Such design alternatives can affect traffic operations, as well as safety, along a highway section. Following is a discussion of relationships between cross-sectional elements and accident experience, along with the accident reductions expected due to related roadway safety improvements. All of the information on crash relationships for lanes, shoulders, and bridges (and corresponding effectiveness information for countermeasures) are for two-lane, rural roads only. Most of the discussion on roadside effects relates to rural two-lane roads, although multilane roads and urban areas are included in some of the discussion (e.g., relating to utility pole accidents and countermeasures). The discussion of median design includes only multilane Interstate and parkway roads in rural areas.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:af5d9227e03663b0c1a373119859fbba60c3bd126dcee19dec74f1f4b10f0ac896b00ac55e0383a802656b03fdfed3f56f762d55b96a84a3763045b396997361
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 10.28 MB ]
PREVIOUS
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
Details
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
BACK TO TOP