United States Department of Transportation
i
Impacts of Hydraulic Modeling Methods on Bridge Scour Analysis
-
2023-08-01
-
[PDF-13.10 MB]
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final Report (April 2020-June 2023)
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This study has three primary purposes: 1) to investigate the impacts of hydraulic modeling methods on bridge scour analysis, 2) to develop recommendations for sediment/soil sampling methods, and 3) to conduct bridge scour risk assessments. Field data were collected at five study sites to obtain the required terrain and soil/sediment input data for hydraulic modeling and scour analyses. The recommended methods developed for soil/sediment sampling in the overbank areas are soil augers or test pits, and for overwater locations, a FISP or clamshell sampler is recommended. Contraction, abutment, and pier scour depths were computed using the HEC-18 guidelines with hydraulic conditions determined from a 1-D model (HEC-RAS) and a 2-D model (SRH-2D). Determining the required input parameters for scour calculations from HEC-RAS results was found to be difficult with many potential sources of human error. In contrast, the Hydraulic Toolbox program for scour calculations can auto-populate the required input parameters directly from SRH-2D output data. For all bridge sites evaluated, estimates for at least one of the main scour categories (i.e., channel contraction scour, pier scour, or abutment scour) were more than 50% different between the HEC-RAS 1-D and SRH-2D results. The key findings from comparing model results were: 1) the angle of attack was the dominant pier scour input parameter and 2) flow conveyance over inundated roadway embankments was significantly greater for SRH-2D relative to the HEC-RAS model. The 2-D modeling methods are recommended for future use given the significant differences observed between the 1-D and 2-D scour results, increased availability of terrain data, current computing resources, and ease of use. Finally, due to differences in the HEC-RAS and SRH-2D estimated scour depths, reanalyzing high-risk and/or visually vulnerable bridges is recommended.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
