Performance Evaluation of Connected Vehicle (CV) and Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Projects in Florida
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Performance Evaluation of Connected Vehicle (CV) and Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Projects in Florida

Filetype[PDF-4.97 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final Report December 2020 – February 2022
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Connected vehicle (CV) technologies and Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) strategies are increasingly being considered by transportation agencies to improve the safety and mobility of the transportation network. To fully understand the potential benefits of CV and TSM&O initiatives, it is crucial to not only identify the performance measures used to evaluate the progress of each initiative, but also to estimate the benefit-to-cost (B/C) ratios to justify the funding requests associated with implementing these technologies and strategies. The primary goal of this research was to assist the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in developing approaches to evaluate the performance of CV projects and current TSM&O strategies being deployed, including the Rapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) program, the Road Ranger Service Patrol (RRSP) program, and the Smart Work Zone (SWZ) TSM&O strategies. A comprehensive review of the existing body of literature was conducted to identify the quantitative and qualitative performance measures and metrics that are being considered in evaluating the performance of CV deployments and TSM&O strategies. B/C analyses were conducted to quantify the mobility and safety benefits associated with implementing the RISC and RRSP programs. Results indicate that for every dollar spent on the RISC program, $5.78 is returned in secondary crash savings, and $1.20 is returned in incident-related traffic delay savings. For every dollar spent on the RRSP program, $5.15 is returned in secondary crash savings, and $7.44 is returned in incident-related traffic delay savings. The study also discussed the potential safety and mobility benefits of Smart Work Zone (SWZ) technologies. Performance criteria and evaluation metrics were also developed for the different stages of the CV project development process (i.e., pre-project phase, planning phase, design-deploy-test phase, and the operations & maintenance phase). The performance criteria of two CV deployments in Florida (Gainesville Signal Phase and Timing (SPaT) Project and I-4 Florida’s Regional Advanced Mobility Elements (I-4 FRAME) Project) were also reviewed. Findings from this research offer guidance in evaluating the effectiveness of CV and TSM&O initiatives. Evaluation criteria and approaches presented in this report can better prepare FDOT for deployments.
  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

Related Documents

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov