Problems, solutions and recommendations for implementing CODES (Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System)
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Problems, solutions and recommendations for implementing CODES (Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System)

Filetype[PDF-134.47 KB]


English

Details:

  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • TRIS Online Accession Number:
    806972
  • OCLC Number:
    46622165
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Accidents;NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Highway Safety;NTL-REFERENCES AND DIRECTORIES-Statistics;
  • Abstract:
    Problems, solutions and recommendations for implementation have been contributed by 16 of the 27 CODES states and organized as appropriate under the administrative, linkage and application requirements for a Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES). The purpose of this report is to provide feedback to states interested in implementing CODES. A background section describes the funding of the CODES states and the CODES Model. Administrative problems focus on maintaining communication, supporting a collaborative source of authority, developing policies for confidentiality and release of CODES linked data, managing CODES and institutionalization. Linkage problems focus on data access, data quality/preparation, linkage, and validation. Application problems focus on statistical issues, personnel issues, confidentiality issues, limitations for case selection, production issues, decision making and Web site development. Recommendations for successful implementation also are organized under the administrative, linkage and application categories.
  • Format:
  • Alternate URL:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov