U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Evaluation of Sediment Barrier Practices Using Large-Scale Testing Techniques

File Language:
English


Select the Download button to view the document
Please click the download button to view the document.

Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final Comprehensive Report
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Perimeter controls [i.e. sediment barriers (SBs) or sediment retention devices (SRDs)] are typically used on construction sites to retain sediment within the limits of the site and prevent polluted stormwater runoff from adversely affecting the environment by degrading aquatic habitats and clogging storm sewers. However, little data exists regarding the performance of the various products and practices used as perimeter controls. Often, design parameters are based upon rules-of-thumb and field observation that lack scientific data that establishes expected performance capabilities. SB practices used as perimeter controls must be capable of intercepting sheet flow stormwater runoff, effectively treating sediment-laden flow such that sediment removal is achieved, and efficiently discharging treated stormwater so that sediment resuspension is minimized. Nonetheless, products and practices are typically evaluated through field performance testing with little monitoring and data collection associated with installation, runoff characteristics, and water quality performance. If data is available from field evaluations, the data is site and climatic specific, making it difficult to compare the performance between practices and geographic areas. Therefore, researchers at the Auburn University – Erosion and Sediment Control Testing Facility developed a test apparatus and methodology to evaluate different SB practices using full-scale testing methods. The test apparatus and methodology is designed to replicate in-field rainfall runoff rates for purposes of conducting full-scale experiments on various SBs. This apparatus allows for performance testing and direct comparisons between various SB products, practices, and installations. The overall intent of conducting full-scale testing is to improve design criteria and enhance the in-field performance of SBs.
  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:759e03299206676fd17d4365a42869da38912c7f55b348f25c15e5572ab6a12d1211117a6f4ad65974cced5d2c96492b4abdef3c2da3d8d356cc696ef2211057
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 11.80 MB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.