San Francisco urban partnership agreement : national evaluation plan.

Details

• Creators:
  Zimmerman, Carol ; Shao, Gang ; Balke, Kevin ; Schreffler, Eric ; Rodier, Caroline ; Shaheen, Susan ; Munnich, Lee
• Corporate Creators:
  Battelle Memorial Institute
• Corporate Contributors:
  United States. Department of Transportation. Research and Innovative Technology Administration ; United States. Federal Highway Administration ; United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Transit Administration
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Urban transportation
  • Urban transportation policy
  • Traffic congestion
  • Congestion pricing
  • Parking
  • Evaluation
• Publication/ Report Number:
  FHWA-JPO-10-022
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  San Francisco (California)
• Corporate Publisher:
  United States. Dept. of Transportation. Research and Innovative Technology Administration
• Abstract:
  This report provides an analytic framework for evaluating the San Francisco Urban Partnership Agreement ; (UPA) under the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) UPA Program. The San Francisco ; UPA projects to be evaluated focus on those related to variable parking pricing. Those projects include variable ; pricing of on-street and off-street parking in the City of San Francisco, enhancements to 511 to include parking ; information, an integrated payment system for parking and transit, and expansion of telecommuting/TDM ; outreach activities to support the other projects. The San Francisco UPA national evaluation plan identifies ; major questions to be answered through the evaluation, the evaluation analyses to be used to address those ; questions, and the data needed for the analyses. It also outlines the test plans that will be used to collect and ; analyze the required data. The evaluation plan is based on the National Evaluation Framework (NEF) prepared ; for the U.S. DOT. Four objective questions that were posed by U.S. DOT serve as a starting point for the NEF ; and San Francisco evaluation plan. These questions are how much congestion was reduced; what contributed to ; the reduction and what were the associated impacts; what lessons were learned about non-technical factors for ; success; and what were the overall cost and benefit of the congestion reduction strategies. The four objective ; questions were translated into twelve evaluation analyses, which in turn consist of hypotheses and questions, ; measures of effectiveness (MOEs), and data required for the MOEs. This document presents the plan for ; evaluating the San Francisco UPA projects.
  More +
• Format:
  PDF
• Funding:
  DTFH61-06-D-00007/ORDER 07-T-08002/WO BA07-041
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4004/dot_4004_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 981.36 KB]
• Collection(s):
  Federal Highway Administration ; ITSJPO Digital Library
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:d5a36dd9cf5a47e29faaca26201cde124d1cb64e8e3403d679d9b0203ea2f067d3474e3631cd99b6253d29a95d11e0a16618914034342c6d9c3a908c6630b87a