Pipeline Safety Fund: Minimum Balance Was Not Reasonably Estimated
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates
...

to

...
Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
...
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Pipeline Safety Fund: Minimum Balance Was Not Reasonably Estimated



English

Details:

  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    The Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), a component of the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) of the Department of Transportation (DOT), performs a variety of activities related to the safety of natural gas (NG) and hazardous liquid (HL) pipelines and liquified natural gas (LNG) storage facilities. OPS activities are funded primarily by user fees assessed to pipeline and LNG storage facility operators and these fees are deposited into the Pipeline Safety Fund (PSF). The Senate Committee on Appropriations expressed an interest in determining the minimum year-end balance necessary in the PSF to maintain OPS operations until user fees are collected for the following year. At September 30, 2000, the balance in the PSF was $16.8 million. Senate Report 106-309 directed that (1) RSPA perform a detailed analysis of the PSF in order to estimate the minimum year end balance that could be maintained without triggering the Antideficiency Act and (2) we review RSPA's analysis. Specifically, as directed by Senate Report 106-309, we reviewed RSPA's analysis to determine if it was accurately prepared based on RSPA/OPS financial records and Treasury reports and whether improvements could be made to the billing and collection cycles that would support a more efficient use of these user fees.
  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF-220.93 KB]

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov