Innovative travel data collection recommendations : final report.
-
2016-12-06
Details
-
Alternative Title:Project title: innovative travel data collection-planning for the next two decades
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This study had the following objectives: ; 1. To identify and clarify these two emerging effects – real time data and changing culture, ; 2. To identify the shifts in data collection and transportation modeling that must take place to ; assist in identifying and forecasting travel behavior, and ; 3. To discuss the impacts of such operational shifts, both in cost and outcomes to provide NYMTC with the cost and efficacy impacts of incorporating these ; emerging tools.” ; To address these objectives, the research team at Albany Visualization and Informatics Lab (AVAIL), led by Dr. Catherine Lawson, PhD., from the University at ; Albany, conducted a literature review; a cost benefit analysis of current and emerging transportation data surveying and modeling ; methodologies; and produced a set of recommendations for the near-term and the longer-term. ; The literature review and cost benefit analysis revealed certain facts about the state of travel data collection in the United States. The paper travel diary remains the ; predominant instrument for collecting travel data despite its well-documented shortcomings and high cost. GPS devices have ; grown in popularity but are used primarily as a supplement for paper travel diaries. The value of travel surveying via smartphones is no longer a strictly academic ; question as numerous agencies have used the smartphone in a travel survey, either as the primary survey instrument or in a ; subsample (Indiana, Oregon, Singapore, Boulder, etc.). Origin-destination tables used in travel demand models can be constructed from social media posts and calldetail ; records though these datasets often lack valuable information (such as reliable trip purpose or mode), present ; incomplete pictures of travel (especially in the case of social media), are prohibitively aggregated, or are not representative. Finally, the research team found it is ; possible to develop and deploy a travel demand model that does not use travel survey data for inputs, opening the possibility of eliminating or reducing the size of ; travel surveys. ; This study introduces two categories to classify data collection efforts: ; 1. Active Data Collection – the use of self-report and surveying to generate data. ; 2. Passive Data Collection – the acquisition of existing data. ; The research suggests three orientations toward travel data collection, each with their own risks and advantages that could satisfy NYMTC’s modeling needs, while ; enabling future cost savings and/or increases in data quality. Two of these three orientations (or pathways) emphasize Active Data ; Collection strategies while the third emphasizes Passive Data Collection. These pathways are fluid and dynamic. They are not intended as a step-by-step guide to the ; future. Instead, they are intended to illuminate the data collection trajectory, highlighting opportunities and delineating the consequences, both positive and ; negative, of various data collection decisions. ; Briefly, these pathways are: ; 1. Paper and Online Diary Travel Survey (with GPS or Smartphone Supplement) ; 2. Smartphone Diary Travel Survey (with Online Supplement) ; 3. Passive Data Collection (with Smartphone Supplement)
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:e74377c6aa28d4efc22bea9a110939991afc4404d6598f5e3e85f2ed18098b5d