Van Houten, R., & Hochmuth, J. (2016). Evaluation of R1-6 gateway treatment alternatives for pedestrian crossings : final report (Report No. RC-1638). Western Michigan University. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31920
Van Houten, Ron and J Hochmuth. Evaluation of R1-6 gateway treatment alternatives for pedestrian crossings : final report. Report no. RC-1638. Western Michigan University, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31920.
Van Houten, Ron, and J Hochmuth Evaluation of R1-6 gateway treatment alternatives for pedestrian crossings : final report. Western Michigan University, 2016, Report no. RC-1638, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31920.
Details
Alternative Title:
Comparison of alternative pedestrian crossing treatments.
A series of studies evaluated the Gateway configuration of R1-6 in-street signs. A Gateway configuration consists of an R1-6 sign on the centerline, an R1-6 signs on both edges of the roadway, and R1-6 signs on the lane lines if it is a multilane road. The Gateway treatment was markedly more effective than the use of signs only on the centerline or on lane lines. The results showed: 1. That yielding was related to the narrowness of the gaps between signs; that a Gateway configuration consisting of R1-6 signs was markedly more effective than a Gateway made up of blank signs of the same size and background color. Research also demonstrated that mounting edge signs on the curb face was nearly as effective of placing signs in the gutter pan, and that the use of a robust delineator in place of the R1-6 signs on the lane lines was almost as effective as the use of the R1-6 signs on lane lines. This study also examined the efficacy of the Gateway on different types of crosswalk applications, the long-term persistence of effects and sign survival.
Van Houten, R., & Hochmuth, J. (2016). Evaluation of R1-6 gateway treatment alternatives for pedestrian crossings : final report (Report No. RC-1638). Western Michigan University. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31920
Van Houten, Ron and J Hochmuth. Evaluation of R1-6 gateway treatment alternatives for pedestrian crossings : final report. Report no. RC-1638. Western Michigan University, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31920.
Van Houten, Ron, and J Hochmuth Evaluation of R1-6 gateway treatment alternatives for pedestrian crossings : final report. Western Michigan University, 2016, Report no. RC-1638, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31920.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.