Crowley, R., Brown, C. J., Elsafty, A., & Fuller, J. (2016). Analysis, comparison, and contrast of two primary maintenance contracting techniques used by the Florida Department of Transportation (Report No. BDV34 977-04). Florida Department of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31640
Crowley, Raphael, Christopher J. Brown, Adel Elsafty, and Jacob Fuller. Analysis, comparison, and contrast of two primary maintenance contracting techniques used by the Florida Department of Transportation. Report no. BDV34 977-04. Florida Department of Transportation, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31640.
Crowley, Raphael, et al. Analysis, comparison, and contrast of two primary maintenance contracting techniques used by the Florida Department of Transportation. Florida Department of Transportation, 2016, Report no. BDV34 977-04, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31640.
The Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT) Asset Maintenance Contracting Program (AMC) was analyzed during this study to determine if it reduced cost or affected work quality when compared with more-traditional contracts. A survey was conducted of experts from industry, FDOT, and other DOTs to get their opinion on the AMC program. Results showed that if a program like Florida’s AMC is implemented properly, industry experts believe it can be successful. FDOT data from 2009-2015 were analyzed to determine quantitatively whether or not the AMC program was efficient. Meta-frontier ratios were developed between AM and non-AM contract types using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Results showed that AMCs consistently performed more efficiently than non-AMCs. Additionally, results showed that AMCs produced slightly significantly higher-quality work than non-AMCs. Subtle (administrative) cost effects were a relatively unimportant variable in the context of overall efficiency. Elimination of quality rating as an evaluative metric did not appear to affect results. In summary, the AMC program appears to be more efficient than more-traditional contracts.
Crowley, R., Brown, C. J., Elsafty, A., & Fuller, J. (2016). Analysis, comparison, and contrast of two primary maintenance contracting techniques used by the Florida Department of Transportation (Report No. BDV34 977-04). Florida Department of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31640
Crowley, Raphael, Christopher J. Brown, Adel Elsafty, and Jacob Fuller. Analysis, comparison, and contrast of two primary maintenance contracting techniques used by the Florida Department of Transportation. Report no. BDV34 977-04. Florida Department of Transportation, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31640.
Crowley, Raphael, et al. Analysis, comparison, and contrast of two primary maintenance contracting techniques used by the Florida Department of Transportation. Florida Department of Transportation, 2016, Report no. BDV34 977-04, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31640.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.