Quicklime specification and test methods
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Quicklime specification and test methods

Filetype[PDF-2.06 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Samples of pebble quicklime were obtained from each of the six major

    lime producers' plants in Texas. These samples were used for laboratory

    testing which determined chemical composition of the dry lime, physical

    properties of slurries prepared from the quicklime, and reaction properties

    of the lime with soil.

    Preparation of slurries with the six materials using the same methods

    and material quantities yielded viscosities ranging from 13 to 165 poises

    at 77 F with solids contents between 28.5 and 32.4 percent solids.

    Adjustment of the high viscosity slurries to the range of 25-30 poises

    resulted in solids contents between 18.5 and 26.0 percent.

    Wet sieve analyses of slurries prepared using two methods were performed.

    Residues retained on the No. 6 and No. 30 screens were weighed. Residues

    on the No. 30 ranged from 5.5 to 32.8 percent using the standard test

    method and 1.2 to 10 percent using a different slurrying method.

    Quicklime/soil mixes were prepared and subsequently compacted into 4 x 6

    cylinders and cured under moist conditions. These cylinders were tested

    at intervals for compressive strength and unreacted lime content. These

    tests showed no consistent difference in the stabilizing performance of

    the different producers' materials. Samples prepared using quicklime

    passing the 1/4-inch sieve and hydrated lime showed more stabilizing

    effect than the coarsely graded quicklime.

    Recommendations for changes to the existing lime specification and test

    procedures are made within this report. It is recommended that the residue

    requirement for the No. 30 sieve be removed and the limit for the No. 6

    sieve be lowered. It is also recommended that a separate grade of quicklime

    be established solely for slurrying purposes which has no limit on

    fines content.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov