Measuring land use performance: policy, plan, and outcome : a white paper from the National Center for Sustainable Transportation.
-
2015-10-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:The impact of land use patterns on travel behavior is well established in the scholarly literature. ; In particular, much research in the transportation-land use domain has measured the impact of ; land use on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) or on travel behavior indicators like mode choice that ; suggest VMT, where it cannot be measured directly (Ewing & Cervero, 2001, 2010; National ; Research Council, 2009; Salon et al., 2012). Indeed, Ewing and Cervero reviewed 200 studies ; published between 2001 and 2010 alone, summarizing evidence from this abundant literature ; that increases in such land use attributes as residential density, land use mix, accessibility, ; network connectivity, and jobs-housing balance generally correlate with modest reductions in ; VMT (2010). ; Such evidence has fostered consensus in California and elsewhere supporting public policy that ; promotes higher density development, greater mixture of land uses, and improved access to ; employment and housing. By passing the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act ; of 2008, known as SB 375, California lawmakers acknowledged that land use planning could ; attenuate automobile use and, consequently, help to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. ; Further, the law raises expectations for California communities to grow more equitably, with ; attention to affordable housing. It syncs local housing planning with regional transportation ; planning, requires local governments to specify actions to meet low-income housing needs, and ; can compel rezoning to speed affordable housing production where local inertia would delay it. ; The research terrain of the land use-VMT relationship may be well trodden, but important ; upstream linkages bearing on that relationship have been less closely studied. What are the ; intermediate cause-and-effect relationships between broad land use policy crafted by states or ; regions and specific land use plans and polices adopted by local governments? How are specific ; local plans and policies reflected in implementation? Finally, what ultimate impacts can be ; observed in urban form and travel behavior after local plans are implemented?
-
Format:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:1074a77f09ca4e2703db796e32bae0c790c5c0c91f9249f5b34eb8720ee7360c4770dec9a0702f459fc3145e551e5e46ba169af984d1fd7b5e0ab8b69d209fb5