Validation and application of Highway Safety Manual (Part D) and developing Florida CMF Manual, phase 2.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Add terms to the query box

Query box

Help
Clear All
i

Validation and application of Highway Safety Manual (Part D) and developing Florida CMF Manual, phase 2.

Filetype[PDF-2.58 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Contributors:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) Part D provides a comprehensive list of the effects of safety treatments (countermeasures). These effects are quantified by crash modification factors (CMF) which are based on compilation from past studies of the effects of various safety treatments. The HSM Part D provides CMFs for treatments applied to roadway segments, intersections, interchanges, freeways, and special facilities. Nevertheless, it is essential to verify the applicability of the HSM CMFs in specific locales. The objectives of this study are (1) to develop CMFs for various treatments in Florida for the same setting (rural/urban), road types, crash types, and severity levels, (2) to evaluate the difference between these Florida-specific CMFs and the CMFs in the HSM, and (3) to recommend whether the CMFs in the HSM can be applied to Florida or new Florida-specific CMFs are needed. Moreover, in phase II, various Florida-specific CMFs and crash modification functions (CMFunctions) were estimated for the most common treatments in Florida. As with phase I of the project, there is a need to improve some CMFs that had insufficient data. An alternative way to combine multiple CMFs to identify the effectiveness of multiple treatments was suggested in this study. Different methods of observational studies were used to calculate CMFs and to develop CMF functions for a total of 37 additional treatments applied to roadway segments, intersections and special facilities. It was found that Florida-specific CMFs were generally statistically significant, and the safety effects represented by the CMFs were intuitive, similar to the CMFs in the HSM. It was also found that Florida-specific CMFs for the treatments not included in the HSM showed significant positive effects in reducing crash frequencies. We also present a Florida-specific manual of CMFs.
    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.18