U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Electrical resistivity measurement of mechanically stabilized Earth wall backfill : final report.

File Language:
English


Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final report, July 2014-March 2016
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    In Kansas, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls are typically backfilled with coarse aggregate. ; Current backfill material testing procedures used by the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) utilize on-site ; observations for construction quality assurance and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation ; Officials (AASHTO) Standard T 288-12 (2012), “Standard Method of Test for Determining Minimum Laboratory Soil ; Resistivity.” T 288 is designed to test a soil sample’s electrical resistivity, which correlates to its corrosive potential. ; The test, based on material passing through a No. 10 sieve, is considered inappropriate for coarse aggregates and ; potentially leads to over-conservative designs. Additionally, T 288 is run on a sample from the aggregate source, but ; test results may not capture variability of the aggregate used in construction. Electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) ; provides a two-dimensional (2D) profile of the bulk resistivity of backfill material, thereby reducing uncertainty ; regarding backfill uniformity as compared to traditional sampling. The objective of this study was to characterize bulk ; resistivity of in-place MSE wall backfill aggregate using ERI. ERI was used on six walls: five MSE walls and one ; gravity retaining wall that contained no reinforcement. The ERI field method produced a 2D profile that depicted ; electrical resistivity uniformity for bulk analysis. A post-processing algorithm was developed to calculate the bulk ; electrical resistivity of the backfill and reduce the qualitative interpretation of the ERI results. These results indicate ; that the laboratory analysis of T 288 underestimates the bulk electrical resistivity of in situ backfill material. ; Recommendations of the study were that ERI surveys and calculated mean electrical resistivity be utilized as ; construction quality assurance in order to reduce uncertainty of current selection practices.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Funding:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 2.35 MB]
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:c7709c22f101bc748640819985a9b09452678b3265e1d7a484e2b5599cc66e24
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
 Found an issue?
Send us an email at:
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.