Electrical resistivity measurement of mechanically stabilized Earth wall backfill : final report.

Details

• Creators:
  Tucker-Kulesza, Stacey ; Snapp, Michael ; Koehn, Weston
• Corporate Creators:
  Kansas State University. Transportation Center ; Kansas State University. Department of Civil Engineering
• Corporate Contributors:
  Kansas. Dept. of Transportation. Bureau of Research
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  Algorithms Backfill Soils Coarse Aggregate Coarse Aggregates Electrical Resistivity Electrical Resistivity Imaging Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall Backfill Retaining Walls
• Publication/ Report Number:
  K-TRAN: KSU-15-6
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  United States ; Kansas
• Edition:
  Final report, July 2014-March 2016
• Corporate Publisher:
  Kansas. Dept. of Transportation
• Abstract:
  In Kansas, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls are typically backfilled with coarse aggregate.
  
  Current backfill material testing procedures used by the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) utilize on-site
  
  observations for construction quality assurance and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
  
  Officials (AASHTO) Standard T 288-12 (2012), “Standard Method of Test for Determining Minimum Laboratory Soil
  
  Resistivity.” T 288 is designed to test a soil sample’s electrical resistivity, which correlates to its corrosive potential.
  
  The test, based on material passing through a No. 10 sieve, is considered inappropriate for coarse aggregates and
  
  potentially leads to over-conservative designs. Additionally, T 288 is run on a sample from the aggregate source, but
  
  test results may not capture variability of the aggregate used in construction. Electrical resistivity imaging (ERI)
  
  provides a two-dimensional (2D) profile of the bulk resistivity of backfill material, thereby reducing uncertainty
  
  regarding backfill uniformity as compared to traditional sampling. The objective of this study was to characterize bulk
  
  resistivity of in-place MSE wall backfill aggregate using ERI. ERI was used on six walls: five MSE walls and one
  
  gravity retaining wall that contained no reinforcement. The ERI field method produced a 2D profile that depicted
  
  electrical resistivity uniformity for bulk analysis. A post-processing algorithm was developed to calculate the bulk
  
  electrical resistivity of the backfill and reduce the qualitative interpretation of the ERI results. These results indicate
  
  that the laboratory analysis of T 288 underestimates the bulk electrical resistivity of in situ backfill material.
  
  Recommendations of the study were that ERI surveys and calculated mean electrical resistivity be utilized as
  
  construction quality assurance in order to reduce uncertainty of current selection practices.
  
  
• Format:
  PDF
• Funding:
  C2032
• Collection(s):
  US Transportation Collection
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha256:c7709c22f101bc748640819985a9b09452678b3265e1d7a484e2b5599cc66e24
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/30912/dot_30912_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 2.35 MB ]