U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Calibration of region-specific gates pile driving formula for LRFD : final report 561.

File Language:
English


Select the Download button to view the document
Please click the download button to view the document.

Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final Report, January 2014 - February 2016
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    This research project proposes new DOTD pile driving formulas for pile capacity verification using pile driving blow

    counts obtained at either end-of-initial driving (EOID) or at the beginning-of-restrike (BOR). The pile driving

    formulas were developed using a regional database containing 252 static load tests and 934 dynamic load tests (DLT)

    collected from DOTD projects. The DLTs were conducted on blow counts taken at EOID (183 CAPWAPs) and BOR

    (751 CAPWAPs). The pile driving formulas were developed by conducting a nonlinear regression analysis of the

    generic Gates formula. The LRFD resistance factors (ɸ) were calibrated using the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS)

    method for the Strength I limit state with a reliability index (βT) of 2.33 as recommended for pile groups in AASHTO

    specifications. The current LADOTD pile driving formula (FHWA Gates Formula) used to evaluate blow counts

    taken at EOID was evaluated; results show a best fit ratio of 0.80 with a resistance factor of 0.67—higher than the

    AASHTO specifications resistance factor (ɸ) of 0.40 for the same pile driving formula. The new EOID LADOTD

    Modified pile driving formula has a best fit ratio 0.91 with a resistance factor of 0.59. This study recognizes pile

    capacity setup can significantly affect pile driving formulas ability to predict pile capacity when using blow counts

    obtained at BOR. Pile capacity setup was evaluated by computing the Skov-Denver pile setup factors (AQ) using total

    pile capacity (Q). A minimum of two pile setup categories (A and B) were identified in Louisiana. Pile setup

    category A is located in the coastal marshes along the gulf coast of Louisiana with setup factors (AQ) ranging from

    0.135 to 0.428. Pile setup category B was assigned to the remainder of the state with AQ pile setup factors ranging

    from 0.021 to 0.108. An evaluation of the pile setup curves using the Skov-Denver model indicates that more than

    90% of the long-term pile capacity (load test conducted at t = 14 days) can be obtained at t ≥ 6 days for pile setup

    category A and t ≥ 3 days for pile setup category B. A BOR pile driving formula was developed for setup category A

    with restrikes conducted at t ≥ 1 days with a best fit ratio of 0.93 and a corresponding resistance factor (ɸ) of 0.64. A

    different BOR pile driving formula was developed for pile setup category B with restrikes conducted at t ≥ 1 days

    with a best fit ratio of 0.92 and a corresponding resistance factor (ɸ) of 0.605. Recommendations on the

    implementation of these EOID and BOR pile driving formulas have been included in this study.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:76a7476f7779d85cc1e006cc3b3718c9646cf69e3b00cca9df044f04ed34a200
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 13.91 MB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.