Using expert opinion to quantify accuracy and reliability of nondestructive evaluation on bridges.
-
2015-08-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:Bridge inspection is an important phase in bridge management. In 2009, a joint American Society of Civil ; Engineers Structural Engineering Institute and AASHTO Ad-Hoc group was created to identify the issues ; in bridge safety and to study current bridge practices. This group recommended: “A more rational, risk-based approach to determining the appropriate inspection intervals for bridges is needed, as opposed to a ; set twenty-four month cycle for all bridges.” The committee also recommended a wider use of NDE ; methods. The difficulty in increasing the use of these NDE methods is the increased costs and time spent. ; One way to deal with this is to implement risk-based planning. Although to do this, the accuracy, ; reliability, bias, and cost of each test must be quantified. This study attempts to quantify these parameters ; for common bridge NDE methods. This was done through two methods. First, a literature review was ; performed to determine common NDE methods and data were found for these methods. Second, a Delphi ; method survey was conducted to develop a broader range of data that matches real life practices. All of ; the data were then analyzed and conclusions were drawn to quantify the various parameters for these ; NDE methods.
-
Format:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:a615705964bb1d3667516c4fe876a79165e2fadaab72763cbf69011dbaa91b40