Review of NJ point system.
-
2013-03-01
Details
-
Alternative Title:Review of New Jersey point system.
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:The purpose of this study is to investigate the comparative effectiveness of point-based versus incident-based ; negligent driver monitoring systems and to explore how certain changes to the existing point-based system used in ; New Jersey might improve the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission’s (MVC) ability to properly identify and ; address problem drivers. This study seeks to address an existing gap in the literature and advance the current ; state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of point- versus incident-based monitoring systems. The results of ; this study further confirm the results of previous studies that the interventions used by MVC to correct problem ; driver behavior are effective. As part of this study, the research team used survival analysis to show that the ; average time to next offense for driver’s subjected to MVC interventions increases significantly for all three ; interventions used. Three primary alternatives to MVC’s current point-based system of driver monitoring and ; control were investigated. Alternative #1 retained MVC’s existing point-based monitoring system but limited or ; eliminated the practice of plea bargaining motor vehicle offenses. Alternative #2 replaced MVC’s current point-based system of monitoring with an incident-based system; and Alternative #3 supplemented the existing point-based system with an incident-based habitual offender license suspension program. Each of the alternatives ; results in increased system outputs in the form of advisory notices, re-education class enrollments and license ; suspensions. These additional interventions result in improved safety outcomes in the form of longer periods of ; safe driving after intervention and fewer future violations and crashes among the drivers in each cohort. ; Across the alternatives, improvement in time until next offense is greatest among male drivers. This may be in part ; due to the fact that male drivers have higher overall rates of violation than female drivers. The best results in terms ; of time until next offense appear to derive from Alternative #1 Case 1 which presents the highest level of ; improvement across virtually every age and gender cohort. Interestingly, Alternative #2 which by far subjects the ; greatest number of drivers to interventions of all types presents improvements slightly below Alternative #1 Case 1. ; Alternative #3 does appear to result in longer times to next offense among habitual offenders but the times ; between offenses remain very short. This result highlights the fact that “hard core” habitual offenders are likely to ; pose significant safety concerns even though more drivers are subject to license suspension, the most strict of the ; interventions used by MVC. From the analysis it seems clear that there are changes that MVC can make to ; enhance the agency’s ability to address negligent driving behavior and thereby improve highway safety. However, ; at least two of alternatives explored in this study, Alternatives #1 and #2 present significant and perhaps ; insurmountable political, systems and operational challenges. Alternative #3 presents the most promise but it too ; will require careful consideration of the costs and benefits of any change.
-
Format:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:dd01195033754e4511c6f7c9d21de0aa136f4b3f1644ddf0e5e468098ba8737540cb230277aea10ee748e49c234f2f904518040f61df5a2211e8dec16b585b02