Calibrating the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for Kansas.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Calibrating the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for Kansas.

Filetype[PDF-3.00 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) is moving toward the implementation of the new American

      Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG)

      for pavement design. The MEPDG provides a rational pavement design framework based on mechanistic-empirical principles to

      characterize the effects of climate, traffic, and material properties on the pavement performance, as compared with the 1993

      AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Before moving to the MEPDG, the nationally calibrated MEPDG distress

      prediction models need to be further validated and calibrated to the local condition.

      The objective of this research was to improve the accuracy of the MEPDG to predict the pavement performance in

      Kansas. This objective was achieved by evaluating the MEPDG-predicted performance of Kansas projects, as compared with the

      pavement performance data from the pavement management system (PMS), and calibrating the MEPDG models based on the

      pavement performance data. In this study, 28 flexible pavement projects and 32 rigid pavement projects with different material

      properties, traffic volumes, and climate conditions were strategically selected throughout Kansas. The AASHTO ME Design

      software (Version 1.3) was used in this study.

      The comparisons between the MEPDG-predicted pavement performance using the nationally calibrated models and the

      measured pavement performance indicated the need for the calibration of the MEPDG models to the Kansas conditions. For new

      flexible pavements, the MEPDG using the nationally calibrated models overestimated the rutting due to the overprediction of the

      deformation of the subgrade layer. Biases also existed between the predicted top-down cracking, thermal cracking, and

      International Roughness Index (IRI) and the measured data. The relationship between the measured and the predicted IRIs was

      more obvious than that for the cracking. Using the coefficients determined through local calibration in this study, the biases and the

      standard errors were minimized for all the models based on the statistical analysis.

      For new rigid pavements, very low mean joint faulting was measured in actual projects as compared with the default

      threshold of the MEPDG. The type of base course had a minor effect on the pavement performance. The traditional splitting data

      method was adopted in the process of local calibration. After the local calibration, the biases between the predicted pavement

      performance (mean joint faulting and IRI) and the measured pavement performance were minimized, and the standard errors were

      reduced.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26