United States Department of Transportation
i
Calibrating the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for Kansas.
-
2015-04-01
-
[PDF-3.00 MB]
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:The Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) is moving toward the implementation of the new American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG)
for pavement design. The MEPDG provides a rational pavement design framework based on mechanistic-empirical principles to
characterize the effects of climate, traffic, and material properties on the pavement performance, as compared with the 1993
AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Before moving to the MEPDG, the nationally calibrated MEPDG distress
prediction models need to be further validated and calibrated to the local condition.
The objective of this research was to improve the accuracy of the MEPDG to predict the pavement performance in
Kansas. This objective was achieved by evaluating the MEPDG-predicted performance of Kansas projects, as compared with the
pavement performance data from the pavement management system (PMS), and calibrating the MEPDG models based on the
pavement performance data. In this study, 28 flexible pavement projects and 32 rigid pavement projects with different material
properties, traffic volumes, and climate conditions were strategically selected throughout Kansas. The AASHTO ME Design
software (Version 1.3) was used in this study.
The comparisons between the MEPDG-predicted pavement performance using the nationally calibrated models and the
measured pavement performance indicated the need for the calibration of the MEPDG models to the Kansas conditions. For new
flexible pavements, the MEPDG using the nationally calibrated models overestimated the rutting due to the overprediction of the
deformation of the subgrade layer. Biases also existed between the predicted top-down cracking, thermal cracking, and
International Roughness Index (IRI) and the measured data. The relationship between the measured and the predicted IRIs was
more obvious than that for the cracking. Using the coefficients determined through local calibration in this study, the biases and the
standard errors were minimized for all the models based on the statistical analysis.
For new rigid pavements, very low mean joint faulting was measured in actual projects as compared with the default
threshold of the MEPDG. The type of base course had a minor effect on the pavement performance. The traditional splitting data
method was adopted in the process of local calibration. After the local calibration, the biases between the predicted pavement
performance (mean joint faulting and IRI) and the measured pavement performance were minimized, and the standard errors were
reduced.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
