U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Comparison of conventional and internally cured concrete bridge decks in Utah : Mountain View corridor project.

File Language:
English


Select the Download button to view the document
Please click the download button to view the document.

Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    The objectives of this research were to 1) monitor in-situ moisture and diffusivity for both conventional concrete

    and concrete containing pre-wetted lightweight fine aggregate (LWFA), 2) compare deck performance in terms of

    early-age cracking, compressive strength, and chloride ingress, and 3) compare concrete properties in terms of

    compressive strength, chloride permeability, elastic modulus, and water content in the laboratory using cylinders

    cast in the field at the time of deck construction. The research involved field and laboratory evaluations of four

    newly constructed bridge decks located in northern Utah, two constructed using conventional concrete and two

    constructed using pre-wetted LWFA to promote internal curing. Data from sensors embedded in the concrete decks

    indicate that the volumetric moisture content and electrical conductivity of the internally cured concrete were higher

    than those of the conventional concrete during the 2-year monitoring period. Laboratory data indicate that the

    internally cured concrete was weaker at 1 year following deck construction, passed less current in rapid chloride

    permeability testing, had a lower modulus in free-free resonant testing, and had a higher gravimetric moisture

    content than the conventional concrete. In the field, the internally cured concrete was weaker at 2 years in Schmidt

    rebound hammer testing and exhibited greater chloride concentrations at both 1 and 2 years than the conventional

    concrete. The conventional concrete bridge decks had more reflection cracking from the joints between the

    underlying pre-cast half-deck panels than the internally cured concrete decks.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:80164d005445fb7f11f314c250a4cd7d50ca6608802041807239caa20aedc710
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 18.12 MB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.